The constitutional right of denial
Donald, I can't "deny" it...that was one of your best columns to date! Thanks for putting into words what most of us are thinking.
I accept your denial, poof, you're not a denier.
You covered a lot here Don. As usual I can't disagree with a single damn thing you said. Even someone from 10 years in the past would have trouble getting to grips with the current quagmire we find ourselves in. Shocking, disgusting situation. I don't hold out much hope. Thank you for posting this.
That's some top-flight denying, no denying it.
Good rant. The truth is really hard to suppress. Our would-be controllers must be approaching panic mode as their empire built on lies continues to crumble.
Hahaha outstanding work once again. No denying it. I'm with you 💯.
I absolutely love this summation. It expands on what I have been saying for years. That is that we no longer have a justice system. Rather, we have a legal system in which the legality can change on the whim of bought and paid for judges and politicians. "Diversity" is just a way of making the divide and conquer theory more palatable to the sheeple. They stampede to get in line to conform lest they be thought of as racist, misogynist or any other "ist" that is thrown their way.
Way to go Don. This piece expresses every thing that is so blatantly wrong with this mess we call society. Kudos to you sir.
You mean we still have a few shreds of a constitution? I thought that was incinerated along with junior's laptop and obama's birth certificate.
This may not “technically “ be you best work....comedic interjections, clever double entendres etc.... but I humbly suggest this has been your most poignant and truth telling, “lay it all on the table” work to date.
I wish this could be shouted from the mountaintops...
If only people would/could/ should wake up.
You are so “right in” the irony is obvious and unpalatable all at the same time, it’s almost mind-bending.
Please keep on “keeping on”, you’re giving hope to hopeless knuckleheads like me
On your July 24th post, I went on Amazon and found your book listed.I ordered and even accepted the
$6.95 shipping. The book NEVER ARRIVED. So, I checked my bank and no withdrawal was transacted.
I checked Amazon and no record of my purchase.
I therefore must conclude that your book is being censored. I have searched on ebay and they show no match. You, my friend have been censored.
I do enjoy your rants.
I can't deny it. This was an excellent post! Thank you Don.
Simply put, this was a superb article! The suffix -- denial -- or denier, has been tailored to short-circuit critical thinking, or any kind of thinking whatsoever regarding the subject matter at hand. It is the operative equivalent of "racist" tossed by predictable lobotomized Leftists, who cannot muster a cogent intellectual argument to challenge their opponents.
"Anti-semitic" and "anti-semitism" is another favorite of the denial crowd, as it is cavalierly used to tar any criticism of Jews or Israel. Yet, even a cursory examination of the word will reveal that the root, Semite, refers to Akkadians, Canaanites, Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs... and Jews, among others. But this term is never used as a shield to to deny criticism of any ethnic group other than Jews. Why not just say "anti-Jew"? For the same reason "denier" is used by censorious brain-dead Leftists: it is used to short-circuit critical thinking and an honest examination of the subject at hand.
Much easier to brand any critic of "The Chosen" as a "hater," the evolutionary semantic end-product of labeling such a critic to be a "denier," rather than examine the merits of the argument killed in the womb by this over-used epithet.
I think I'll just go ahead and Deny government, that Forever and Always Enemy of Freedom. And if "No government" means chaos, as we are all taught endlessly from day one, I think I might actually prefer That chaos over This chaos. But alas, anarchy does Not mean chaos. It literally means "Absence of Rulers." Maybe we should have an Anarchy Hour ... say once a week, maybe. One hour with no government. My guess is that things would not summarily unravel. Things might actually "ravel" for a change. Time to choose your chaos wisely, I reckon. Unmeasurable thanks to the Oracle of Rant. Keep firing, Brother ... you're Right Over the Target. ~~ j ~~
I respectfully disagree on language, Don. I see the issue in the context of racial preservation. Language is the ultimate cultural barrier. Does any white person, really want a non white immigrant male speaking English to his attractive teenage daughter with seduction in mind? With the obstacle of language, he cannot get to first base. White men built the U.S. Destroy the white race and you destroy the U.S. and that is precisely what's happening. Victoria's Secrets models, like all models, are transsexual androgynes. Should anyone deny this, explain to me how they all happen to have male physical traits such as straight clavicles, square shoulders that go beyond the hip line, tree trunk necks with Adams Apples or scars where they were obviously removed, the larger male skull with defined male jaw line and dental arch, male quadriceps & pelvis giving them the male, "Toy Soldier" walk, long arms that extend beyond the crotch to the thighs, etc. etc. I recently read a tome by an anthropologist who has studied savage or semi savage non white tribes all over the earth. Incredibly, the males absolutely love fat, obese women, the fatter the better. It is a mark of status for a man to have the fattest wife. Truly sickening. It is futile to discuss climate anything without factoring in the most salient aspect of it, geoengineering of the weather. This is ubiquitous and is rapidly causing a collapse of all the earth's life support systems. All of the major powers are in on it, including the BRICS nations. Bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. Hollywood is, "Kosher Valley" and all pro sports are fixed (just like elections and everything else), and are legally classified as entertainment. Though politics has no such legal classification, it is entertainment as well though of a much more disgusting variety. You cannot legislate against emotion. If a sicko absolutely loves to dismember people with a chainsaw, should he be prosecuted for a "Love" crime? "History is but a pack of tricks we play upon the dead." - Voltaire. Brilliant piece, Don, thank you.
No where in the Constitution does it say anything about giving up your rights to appease crybaby leftists.