Great read , i to am a Kennedy fanatic. I have a blue JFK hoodie I wear on weekends on dog walks.. JFK did not want Isreal to have nukes and insisted on inspection’s . Isreal duped the inspectors and carried on . All of us thinkers know the Mossad carried a big stick in the murder . Mossad attempted to murder everyone on US Liberty a few years later..Friends like that who needs enemies.
Yes, JFK was involved in a heated behind the scenes dispute with David Ben-Gurion over Israel developing nuclear weapons. Another thing about Old Joe Kennedy- he was considered anti- Semitic by all the usual suspects. He was an early critic of the Federal Reserve, and undoubtedly talked about this kind of thing with his children.
In 1967, in the middle of a hot war for their national survival against Arab attackers, USN Spy Ship, the Liberty was off the coast of Israel, relaying Israeli troop movements to Israel's Arab attackers.
That's how the Liberty earned it's fate.
Jew Haters really hate being confronted with this essential reality,yet after decades of mindless prattle, there is no getting around it:
1) Liberty was designed and commissioned as a Spy Ship.
2) There is no other justification or reason for them to be anchored off the Israeli coast.
3) There is no other reason for Israel to attack, no other advantage to be gained but stopping the Liberty from Betraying Israel.
4) The matter was hushed up as an " accident" and not prosecuted by the US government for only one logical reason: To keep US perfidy and betrayal hidden.
The Liberty was clearly marked as a U.S. vessel. Attacking it like that was a very strange thing for our "greatest ally" to do. Of course, our own perfidy had to be covered up, but that consisted primarily of concealing the attack in the first place, and our failure to hold Israel accountable. Do you think our government would have treated an attack on a U.S. ship- spying or not- by Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, or any other nation too small to fight back effectively- just as cavalierly?
How do you become a "Jew hater" by talking about a military attack that cost U.S. lives, and was entirely covered up for decades? Juxtapose the absolute failure to even acknowledge this incident, against the fake attacks on the Maine in 1898, Lusitania to precipitate our entrance into WWI, Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the Gulf of Tonkin psyop that led to the disastrous escalation in Vietnam.
"As a minimum, the attack must be condemned as an act of military recklessness reflecting wanton disregard for human life... The Secretary of State wishes to make clear that the United States Government expects the Government of Israel also to take the disciplinary measures which international law requires in the event of wrongful conduct by the military personnel of a State."
-- Letter from SecState Dean Rusk to the Israeli govt, 10-Jun-1967
"I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. Their sustained attack to disable and sink Liberty precluded an assault by accident or some trigger-happy local commander. Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous."
Zapruder was a Jew who was a member of the Dallas Jewish Businessmen's Association that invited JFK to Dallas. Then just coincidentally he ends up directly at the spot where JFK is shot, with a movie camera no less. Not 50 or 100 or 200 feet away from the location of the hit, but spot on. Then, again coincidentally, Zapruder had a photo developing lab in his house where he could doctor the film to remove the section where the car slowed down to allow the assassins to get a better shot. The shooting spot was marked on the curb so the driver could see it. Then after doctoring the film he delivered it to the FBI.
The there is the report in Laurent Guyenot's book JFK-9/11 that Israeli's then Prime Minister, Golda Meir, was overheard by American intelligence on a phone call when a caller told her that Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) had killed Oswald, her reaction was: "Ovey! We're going to get caught!".
Today, our government has been taken over in an election coup covered up by a Scamdemic, and the midterm elections in 2022 once again rigged, and the citizenry continues to golf, watch football and soap operas, as if nothing has happened and will return to normal.
Machiavelli was wrong about conspiracies - he wrote that conspiracies are almost impossible to hide. In a modern mass media society, conspiracies are everyday events. And Evangelical Christians continue the mantra that we need to love the Jews and that the way to salvation is from the Jews. The Christian scriptures were forged a long time ago, and no one caught on then, or now.
I've never heard that Golda Meir comment before. The people who misrule us conspire instinctively. They don't know any other way. I get the "someone would have talked thing" all the time. Lots of people have talked. No one with any power will listen. Thanks.
Wayne: I strongly suggest you read Jacob Hornberger's book about the Zapruder Film. Hornberger's book came out last year. It is very illuminating about what really happened to the film and the Zapruder family.
RFKjrenstein part 1. Kennedy, the "well-informed intellectual" is a climate cultist who believes that CO2 is our enemy, and supports the Green New Deal. He may not be as radical as the other climate cultists on the left, but he is "next of kin". His adherence to the cult of climate science targetting CO2 as the original sin, capable of flooding cities, and causing shifting weather patterns, leading us all down the path of the day-after-tomorrow apocalypse.... is as dangerous as the vaccine he opposes. Yet, with apocalypse NOW at our front door, he continues to fly private.
"Science" was the excuse for vaccine mandates. "Science" likewise is the excuse for the war against all things carbon, is a war against western society, and a war against prosperity. And the world and its energy sources are pretty much all traced to carbon in some form or fashion, and we would all be starving without it.
I wrote about this on my own substack, the world is fully dependent on Carbon. Still, RFKjrenstien issues threats...threats, albeit before he thought about running for POTUS....back in 2014.....there ought to be a law against the wrong think on "science" (where have I heard that before?), and three hots and a cot for the Koch brothers, I guess the intellectual giant, RFKjrenstein, missed the day they taught the bill-of-rights at law school.
I expected better of Donald Jeffires. As as one of his paid subscribers, there is a sucker born every minute. No worries, with RFKjrenstein's position on vaccination, nad vaccine mandates, there is not a snowballs chance in hell the Dem establishment will allow RFKjrenstein anywhere near the democrat nomination. He's a side show circus act.
I'm sorry I let you down, Arnold. Especially considering you are a generous paid subscriber. I told Sherri Tenpenny to tell him that he should address his past comments, especially the one about locking up climate change "deniers." I am getting sucked in, and should really know better. Thanks.
Even if we grant all of the RFK Jr. flaws pointed out by Arnold, it would still be good for the country if the far-more-flawed Biden were forced to debate with him.
On CO2 warming: it's real, but less serious than promoted by those looking for an excuse to regiment us. Why do I think it's real? 1) A physicist (on Quora, forgot the name) did a study that accounted for confounding errors (like taking the temperature near a heat exhaust vent) and found something like a 1 degree C warming due to CO2 over the past century or so; 2) CO2 warming predicts stratospheric heating; sun cycle-based warming predicts no stratospheric warming. We have stratospheric warming. I've heard that undersea volcanoes are heating the North Atlantic; a reminder that Mother Nature has the last word.
I appreciate your perspective, Greg. Even if RFK, Jr. has no chance, or is compromised, he is bringing issues to the table that no one else is. Like Trump, he serves a purpose in mentioning these things alone. Thanks.
We also know that the world has been far warmer in the past ( and far colder too) with considerably higher CO2 levels. Life still goes on. The elite prey on our natural human arrogance to convince us that we are almost God-like and thus can control the natural functions of this world. When you look for possible ulterior motives on behalf of the "zero carbon" promoters you will realize it all comes down to money and power. CO2 is one of the main building blocks of life itself. How have they managed to whip up so much panic over a necessity of life is beyond me.
Yes, "Climate Change" is one of their biggest myths. As a lifelong environmental activist, RFK, Jr. naturally gravitated to it. He should really examine the "science" behind it. I'd also like to see him comment on and visit the people in East Palestine, Ohio, site of a now forgotten recent ecological disaster. Thanks.
Since RFK, Jr. follows the evidence wherever it takes him, I’m certain he will question the climate change narrative at some point. At this moment he is saying that powerful interests are using climate scare tactics to push an agenda that will shovel even more wealth to the billionaire class. It’s his devotion to the truth that attracts me to his candidacy. No one else comes close to that standard.
The Government has been controlling weather for decades. There are patents, strategic papers going back years and years and people better versed than me allege the earthquake in Turkey was punishment for stepping out of line.
Climate change is a Psy Op, and does not reflect reality.
You might take a look at the opposition viewpoint.
People as credentialed as the Global Warming crowd state unequivocally that CO2 is not driving Global Warming or Climate Change and that it is in no way vaguely possible that it might.
We have stratospheric warming-- so what? How warm is the stratosphere? Minus 65C or so? Does anyone believe that minor warming of the stratosphere affects the surface?
The planetary climate is so complex that I doubt that any attempt to eliminate "confounding factors" would be anything less than hand-waving.
There really is no physical basic for the theory of CO2 catastrophe: no real evidence at all that it's happening. It's all theory and computer modeling, and real-word "evidence" that specializes in confusing causation.
Don't forget his past stance on the NRA being a terroist group. Does he really stand for the 2nd Amendment? Besides we do not elect our presidents! Check out Dr John Coleman and the Committee of 300! I for one do not Trust RFK Jr. or any politician. In a truly free world there is no government or slave masters to tell us how to live, eat and drink or think.
RFK, Jr.'s past comments reveal an independent spirit who nevertheless still accepted or supported many odious aspects of today's Left. I think he's changed. But you're right- we don't really elect anyone, so I'm probably wasting my time discussing politics. But I've been addicted to it since his father ran and was killed in '68. Like I've said, I'm a huge fan of Frank Capra. Thanks.
I agree with you that the votes aren't actually counted, and probably haven't been for many decades. I read an article in the 1980s that pointed out the impossibility of announcing a winner before all the polls closed in a presidential "election", so that isn't a new idea, just a reasonable one.
You might have read an excerpt from the late Collier brothers' fantastic expose, "Votescam." I covered the issue of electoral fraud in detail in "Hidden History." Thanks, Ed.
I read "Votescam" when it came out. The Colliers reported on the vote fraud by both parties, though they were democrat voters before realizing that voting didn't matter. It's one book that bears a revisitation from time to time, for sure.
LRC's Political Theatre today linked a story on Breitbart (and I don't particularly trust Breitbart) which says that RFKjr said he would sign a ban on "assault weapons" if it crossed his desk. The article doesn't link to the video source, so for what it's worth:
That's a bit misleading. RFK, Jr. defended the Second Amendment, and questioned why anyone would want to take guns away from people. He was pressured by the typically biased "journalist" on News Nation to give the response she wanted. He eventually said that he would sign such a ban, if Democrats and Republicans agreed to it, and he was satisfied with it. He doesn't seem to make this issue a priority in his speeches. Thanks.
The article at Brietbart takes note of RFKjr's pro-2nd Amendment stance. I didn't really trust the article since they included a still shot from the interview, but didn't link to the video itself. Breitbart isn't on my list of trusted sites anyway.
There is no excuse for that, and it's hardly his only anti gun statement.
As wonderful as it would be to resurrect Camelot, he simply is not close to the man his father was.
Here's something you may not know: during the promotion of his Fauci Film, his organization sent me an offer to buy plans for a perpetual energy machine, certain to cut my electric bill in half.
When I pointed out that such is impossible and expressed my dismay at such a retarded scam, they doubled down and insisted it was real!
Just like people want to believe RFK Jr. is real.
No matter how you try to avoid it, you will continue to run up against one salient reality: He is a Lefty.
Actually, there is reason to believe that such energy devices might work. This goes back to John Keeley in the 1870s. Joe Newman invented such a device in the 1980s. He exhibited it at big arenas, but the FDA wouldn't approve it because it was "scientifically impossible." They could find no chicanery on his part, and the machine clearly worked. Nikola Tesla claimed to have found a way to provide free energy for all close to a century ago. The government sent John Trump, Donald's uncle, to confiscate his papers after he died, and no one has seen them since. Or talked about free energy. I wrote all about Stanley Meyer, who seemingly invented a way to power a car on tap water. He died under exceedingly strange circumstances, and his work disappeared like Tesla's. Powerful interests would never allow such an impact on their profits. I will have to look more into whatever I assume the energy company RFK, Jr. founded decades ago, to provide free heat to the poor, is talking about here. If anything, that would attract me more to his candidacy.
It's more in keeping with his philosophy as stated many times, though shockingly at odds with his campaign spiel.
When has that ever happened before.
I don't think it's a joke candidacy .
Biden's was a joke when he announced.
Leftys lack imagination, and China Joe has laughably tried to channel Trump's tough guy stance, as just one example of Leftys plagiarizing what they condemn.
I think they plan a variation on a 2016 theme, whereby RFK engenders a " Groundswell of Support", and thus the DNC convention is " forced" to nominate him.
Meanwhile, Trump supporters all over the net have been sucked in, and some are switching allegiance.
Demonrats have no other possibilities that can provoke that support.
" And I'll get on my knees and pray...We don't get fooled again"!
Though I've heard lots of conservatives defend RFK Jr as not being a climate fanatic like the rest of them, just about 3-4 months ago, on the Children's Health Defense site, RFK Jr posted a comment as "moderator" (I think he did it twice) talking about how "carbon is an existential threat to the planet"- same talking point as the rest of them. And he pleaded with the readers to not get sucked in by the propaganda. I think he truly believes in this climate change hoax and thinks he's smarter than those who think it is a hoax (there was definitely a condescending tone). So, for whatever reason, he knows the science is bought and paid for with the vaccines, but thinks the science is legit for the climate change hoax.
It's really kind of shocking when you think about it--I thought for sure when he saw that climate change was part of the Great Reset he would have realized he had been played. But nope, he still believes it. I give more credit to someone like Prof Mark Crispin Miller who used to be a big promoter of global warming, but has since changed his stance in light of new evidence and he even openly questioned the bizarre "forest" fires out in CA (fwiw- Peggy Hall recently had a tree forensics expert on to go over the evidence).
As for Joe Kennedy Sr, years ago when I looked into WW2 revisionism, I recall reading some interesting info on him, along the lines of him realizing who was behind the wars and communism. So, I searched for "joseph kennedy sr antisemite blamed jews for world war 2" and found some interesting info:
I think JFK and RFK were both aware of the problem--I think at least RFK was trying to get AIPAc to register as a foreign lobby. And years ago, when I was first learning about zionism, I ran into info on Benjamin Freedman, who back in 1961 was warning that the zionists ruled over America like absolute monarchs. Anyway, I recall listening to a guy who was familiar with Freedman and he said that JFK actually met with Freedman. So, I think he was aware.
But it seems like the next generation is quite different. RFK Jr is very pro-Israel, and there was a strange post in one of the magazines about RFK Jr's son going to fight with Ukraine. Sage Hana on substack just did a post on it, but it looked like it was just a professional photo shoot and that maybe he didn't go over there at all.
I understand what you're saying, Sandra. He's been on the Left his whole life. But he has evolved, and is saying some things I never thought I'd hear a presidential candidate say. He could massively disappoint, like Trump (who also said some incredible things). It's extremely unlikely that he has a chance to be elected, given how the voters don't really control elections. Thanks.
I secretly agree with that assessment, but then I remember: American politics can take strange twists and maybe more importantly, we’re in an era unlike any before. I suppose one can say that about any historical period but, no, there is more at stake here than at any time in the past. So I can’t count RFK, Jr. Out. For example: he’s drawing huge support from conservatives.
Thanks for pointing this out for us, Arnold. Some would take it even further to characterize the entire presidential election "process" as a side show circus act effectively keeping the endlessly voting sheeple from perceiving the cliff dead ahead. By definition there is no voting your way out of a coup d' etat. Accordingly some states are coming to the realization that the union is lost and are forming their exit strategy in their noble endeavor for peace, love and freedom. Godspeed to them. ~~ j ~~ #Texit
I see the same thing, which is reflected in most of what I say and write. I explained why I'm pulled into the RFK, Jr. thing. I'm human, and as I keep saying, those Frank Capra films left me with some trace of hope. Thanks.
My circus act comment was specifically aimed at the fact you have an anti-"science"-anti-vaccine candidate in RFKjrenstien running as a Dem would be akin to any republican running being taken seriously while being anti-2A. There is not a snow-ball's chance. "Science" being a pejorative term, the government corrupted, non-falsifiable, computer based garbage-in, garbage-out BS that we have masquerading used by politicians, in collusion with academics, and corporations, and NGOs to enrich themselves, wildly, at our expense.
Yeah, got that and couldn't agree more, well said. Just thought I would take the circus metaphor and run with it to include the entire election charade ... which is certainly awakening many folks to the folly of trying to fix a broken, unfixable system. "Just because the circus has left town doesn't mean you got the monkey off your back."
Don’t own one. I do own a ULEV that I average 4000 miles per year with as I work from home.
I bought that car used. I’ve taken zero vacations the last 4 years. I have had 1 business flight the last 4 years. I’m just guessing my carbon footprint is a tiny tiny fraction of RFKjrensteins, Al Gore’s, or John Kerry’s who work to profit off climate change fear and hysterics. I work for a profit making employer producing products, paying enormous sums of taxes. I come from no wealth. My father died when I was three. My mother lived paycheck to paycheck. I worked my way through undergrad and graduate school. The last thing I want is another green energy ideologue (a grift) in office who grew up with all the advantages I never had, and pushes the green new deal based on really bad science for his benefit and his name, only to impoverish the rest of us. There are more than one way to cull humanity other than vaccines.
I agree. Climate fanaticism is every bit as bad as Covid fanaticism. Both are based on complete pseudoscience.
How does such a well-read man fall for such pseudoscience? That's the question every one of us should ask.
But ... I can see a path forward for Kennedy if the media slowly begins to see that his stance on vaccines was right, and he was right about Covid, and my God we're winning!!! (Do I perceive another narrative raising its head?) Praise be. The left accepts him because he's a climate fanatic and the right accepts him because he's revealed everything. Praise be! Lead us on, Mr. President.
Meanwhile, Klaus and friend are rubbing their hands with glee... oh goody! Climate tyranny! The Mother of All Emergencies! Just have to flatten that curve for three years ... think Kennedy will be able to resist the temptation to save the very planet for future generations?? With his climate advisors whispering in his ear about necessary measures? And the left insisting that he impose harsh measures to save the children and baby animals of the future?
Never mind. I'm sure those folks who brought us a plandemic never thought of anything like this. Surely they never anticipated that maybe people would catch on to the Covid scam and they'd have to pivot to accomplish their end game. Or maybe the plan is much bigger and more elaborate than we imagined?
Freedom requires vigilance. Vigilance requires imagination. Yes or no? I've heard exactly nothing from Kennedy to indicate that he's anything but a climate fanatic. Let that raw fact sink in.
If he weren't a climate fanatic and if he were instead attacking climate pseudoscience as well as pharma pseudoscience, what does that consideration tell us? Then the left would reject him completely. Maybe there really is a pivot going on, and Kennedy may be an unwilling dupe? And, the perfect man for the job?
Freedom requires imagination, to imagine the possible trajectories of what might be happening, and to ensure that those trajectories that inhibit the path of personal freedom and individual self-determination are not the path being set forward, by calling them out and insisting that these avenues be cut off.
I concur with those pointing to Israel /Mossad as the entity responsible for JFK'S murder. They had help of course, from the CIA, the Meyer Lanskey crime syndicate and for added intrigue, a French connection.
JFK was sincerely anti-war, especially with the nuclear threat. Israel on the other hand, would not let anything, or anyone, stand in their way in acquiring the bomb. Never Again.
The three fundamental elements to consider in developing suspects of a crime are, motive, means and opportunity. For me, the entities cited above satisfy all three criteria more than the myriad of other theories.
RFK Jr must know this (JFK Jr apparently did). But he can't say so due to the threat of meeting a similar fate.
As hard as it might be to admit, can't we face the fact that ALL of our presidents have been and still are controlled. JFK was probably our last independent president.
And how can we have any confidence in the election process itself? From hanging chad's to Diebold machines to ballot harvesting to you name it, election integrity has become a contradiction in terms.
Politics is a necessary evil but I no longer look to it as the source of the solutions that this world needs. We fight not against flesh and blood............
Good points, Gary. I believe JFK was the last president who thought he was actually in charge. The electoral process is completely rigged, but they really don't need to commit that much fraud, given the demographic changes and dumbing down of the public. We don't like to face it, but there are millions of Americans out there who will actually vote for these cretins. Thanks.
I could definitely be wrong, but I think that Trump actually thought he was in charge at first, but then he quickly realized that wasn't the case, like when he had to get his cabinet approved and realized that the deep state swamp rats in the Senate had all the power. And I think he initially tried to stick with his America First foreign policy, but all of the Russia hoaxes and constant attacks were to put pressure on him until he caved. Mike Whitney had a good article on how this played out--posted at Unz, something like "Tit for Tat, Why did Mueller let Trump off the hook?" And there was recently a good article by left-leaning Christian Parenti (son of Professor Michael Parenti), where he made a good case that the reason they went after Trump was because he tried to dismantle the empire): https://compactmag.com/article/trump-s-real-crime-is-opposing-empire
So, I still think Trump tried, but I just think it is impossible for one man to take back the nation from this level of corruption. The neocon deep state swamp rats in the Senate would never approve of anyone for Secretary of HHS who is not controlled by pharma, and they would never approve of anyone for Sec of Defense who isn't controlled by the MIC.
Yeah, I don't see a political solution at all. I'm kind of thinking that we need a miracle.
I recently listened to a the video below with Rob Kientz, who has a 25 year background in tech, and it sounds like their digital slave grid agenda is moving forward quickly and I don't really see any opposition (govt is captured and in on it). Kientz says they are building the new system on top of the old, visa/mastercard are in on it, and they may have a way of hooking you into the new system without you even knowing it at first (George Gammon has said something similar):
Blueprint for the End of The Dollar and the BRICS New Currency
Funny how the Republicans propose all these good bills when there is no chance for them to get passed and then when they do have control of both houses of Congress they sell us out every time. There is no way the Senate will pass any of this and if they do Biden will never sign it. We have seen this play many times over the years. When the Rs have control they do nothing and cave to the left every time. Only when they have no power to make anything happen do they put forward good legislation the American people want and America needs. The federal government IS NOT THE SOLUTION. They have all been selling us out for decades and that includes both R and D. The only peaceful solution is state Nullification. Join us at: tncss.substack.com and website: tncss.weebly.com. We have legislation that provides a process for invoking Nullification.
Otto Cahn ( very rich jew) bankrolled Cyrus Schofield in early 20th century to promote & publish the first dispensational rapture doctrine with the hugely printed Schofield reference Bible in London . The new Bible was distributed to all US Bible colleges and schools --you must bless gods chosen people , you must bless Isreal by giving $$$$ and taking tours, if you do all this there will be a secret rapture for you when times get tough...
Hasn’t worked out so well for us. 50 million brainwashed Christian Zionist, the most duped among us all.
Spot on, Brad. Sadly, not many folks knew about the propaganda role of the Schofield Bible, up until fairly recently. Because Zionist Christians are so dumb, and so utterly lacking in spiritual discernment, a large number are now dying from the Jonestown jab. Already I feel their influence weakening.
It does feel like a softening , I’ve lost 2 long term friends because of this silly false doctrine and there universal support of Isreal .. I won’t waiver from the truth..It’s always the same fellas that create all the crisis . Larry Finkelstein BlackRock and on and on.
Old Joe was pretty damn wise on any number of subjects. He would have been a HUGE improvement over FDR for 12 years..He wasn’t owned by the money changers.
He was close friends with Joe McCarthy and James Forrestal, both of whom were murdered by the Deep State at Bethesda Naval Hospital. I will have lots more on just how dishonestly McCarthy's record has been misrepresented in the next volume of Hidden History. Thanks.
I quote Forrestal's great line to his friend Joe McCarthy quite a bit. He said, "McCarthy, if this wasn't some huge conspiracy, once in a while they'd make a mistake in our favor." Thanks.
Well, he went in for a problem with his knee, and died two days later at age 49. There was no autopsy, which is the standard in many of these cases. Thanks.
Sorry to not join in on the Kennedy train, but he seems to have too many flaws.
He has allegedly had many affairs, which means he has issues around sexual/marital fidelity; not just making him a bad role model (if true) but also a surefire blackmail target. As a libertarian I don't
usually care about others' private business, but I'm not going to vote for it either. There are some pretty interesting theories about demonic influences which I tend to agree with in a general sense.
If I vote for a candidate, then he had better give the impression of having angelic influences and not
Luciferian. Kennedy can still fight against the big pharmakeia, and that's wonderful, more power to him. I just don't see any political solution to our current spiritual crisis. It may be that we need to solve the spiritual problems first, and then the political and institutional side will resolve itself.
I don't know that we've ever had an angelic-like candidate, Scott. The best we can hope for at this point, at least to me, is clearly RFK, Jr. I think he's wrong on some important issues, but he's also right on a few crucial ones. There probably is no political solution to this mess. As Bob Dylan once wrote, "The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles." The vandals took our handles a long time ago. The little boy in me, who cried when RFK was killed in 1968, is obviously what is moving me at this point. Thanks.
The fact that RFK Jr. is an avid historian is what makes him so dangerous to the ruling elite. The first thing totalitarian regimes do is rewrite history, which is what is happening now in 'Western Democracies". In reality none of us really know for sure what happened in the past as the victors have always rewritten history. However, in spite of this, that pesky thing truth always has a way of surviving. Truth is what evil people truly fear which is why they hate a man like RFK Jr. so vehemently.
RFK, Jr. isn't perfect- he seems to accept the conventional view of Lincoln and FDR, for example. But he is more informed, about history and current affairs, than all the other politicians put together. He doesn't use sound bites- he explains what he's saying, and cites sources. Most Americans are historically illiterate, so this probably won't win him any votes. Thanks, Peter.
I don't know how many of you own JFK's "Profiles In Courage." It's a book every American (or American at heart) should own, and I've always believed that an updated edition should include a final chapter dedicated to Jack. This moving tribute from Don will do, although it won't be read by our Body Idiotic and it's brutally clear that he died in vain, like Han Solo strangled by Jabba the Hut and trampled with a supercilious sneer. All because he wouldn't "smoke the big cigar."
Has anyone out there read what Brian Desborough has said about the assassination? Google his essay "Stop Misleading the Children, Mr. Jennings "; the shape charge seems to me the "real" solution although there were many shooters.
Thanks, Don, for some eye-opening and exquisitely written real history. It's a perfectly timed antidote, for me, to some of the merciless trashings Dry Throat (honorary Native American title) is being administered by Dr. Shiva and others I don't listen to. I'm sure the whole truth is somewhere in between, but anybody risking their life for truth these days deserves respect and admiration.
...Although Shiva claims that the man says one thing and does another and that his voice is a throat chakra disconnect because his words and actions don't line up. Strange.
Listen to the Pogues' "The Broad Majestic Shannon" for another "toast" to Jack.
The mantra that JFK didn't really write "Profiles in Courage" is yet another anti-Kennedy slur. JFK never wanted to go into politics- he wanted to be a writer. He was very literate and well- read, and unlike most politicians was thoroughly capable of writing his own material. Ted Sorensen worked with him regularly, but was no ghostwriter.
One of the heroes in "Profiles in Courage" was Republican Sen. Robert Taft, whom JFK extolled for criticizing the heinous Nuremberg Trials, which represented an ugly precedent in "justice." Never before had the victors of a war put the losers on trial in a courtroom. Now, almost all Americans think of Nuremberg as the ultimate form of justice. It certainly wasn't that way at the time, and JFK himself spoke out against it. I've been amazed I didn't catch more heat by exposing the Nuremberg Trials for what they were in my book "Crimes and Cover-Ups in American Politics: 1776-1963." Thanks!
I appreciate the kind words, William. RFK's voice condition is a hereditary disorder, not some "chakra." Listen to his grandmother Rose Kennedy talk. She had the same thing. So does one of RFK Jr.'s sisters. Thanks.
I do feel sorry for him, in a human sense and as a painful reminder that even if he had some long shot at the Presidency, it makes him look weak and uncharismatic, and he will be killed before he even receives the nomination, if necessary.
If you have time, I'd love to know what you think of Desborough. You must have heard of him or read his famous stuff. He claims to be ex-DARPA; his statement on Kennedy's autopsy being Tippett is obviously true.
Don't know if you read the article in Paranoia some years ago, but you're quite correct that Chappaquiddick was another spook op to keep Teddy from any Throne thoughts or public support. Could the Jesuits be more vicious?
The Pogues song is "Thousands Are Sailing" , not the other song from the same album.
If you're referring to the idea that officer J.D. Tippit was actually JFK, or whatever that theory involves, I'm afraid I can't buy into that. Imho, it's in the same category as Greer shooting JFK, or the Secret Service "accidentally" killing him, or Ruby not actually shooting Oswald, among others. Thanks.
I don't mean that Tippett was killed in Kennedy's place. He was used as a double to avoid any real autopsy, to provide a pretext for arresting Oswald, and possibly to buy time to plant the rifle in the depository. As I said, read Desborough's essay if you're interested. I wouldn't be sharing this if you didn't seem to care.
I'd love to hear any skeptic's explanation for an officer well known as a Kennedy lookalike receiving a call to go to a certain area and winding up slain on the very same day as the President. I guess the madman had to wipe out everybody resembling him. Even Wikipedia acknowledges the historicity of his highly suspicious death while giving out, of course, a completely false narrative to surround it.
I'm not one of those people who are going to ridicule anyone else's views, William. I find it hard to believe, but who knows? We've been lied to about everything. Thanks.
Would you care to hear why I don't believe that Paul McCartney was replaced? There are two reasons, both manifestly massive to my mind: 1.) The "new" Paul was better than the old, in fact seems to follow a perfect arc of musical improvement, to which he was always dedicated; and 2.) The feud that broke up the band was far too nasty to be counterfeit. After watching a relatively recent interview on YouTube in which he quickly shot out "John did" when he was asked who broke up the band, and in another place reading that John requested a "divorce", the songs Paul wrote after convincing the Boys to make one more-- on "Abbey Road"-- I believe barely sublimate a startling rage at John, his "wife" for so many years. More than that, "MacSwell's Silver Hammer" is (sublimated, as I said) an outright murder fantasy with the metaphysical "Joan" the victim. "Oh, Darling!" is the shriekout of a lover scorned. "Carry That Weight" has no real meaning unless John is That Boy. The "Weight" is the guilt for breaking up the world's biggest band.
If there is any real evidence that Paul died on 9/11/66 ('67, according to Juan O'Savin, who has some valuable inside information but doesn't always know what he's talking about), I'd love to see it. The only evidence that makes me consider this farfetched fantasy based on some lucubrative stoner well lubricated is the clip of George calling Paul "Faul". So I keep an open mind. If there was a body switch, though, they put the old soul into a new body. They probably have that technology.
Thank you kindly for responding. I don't always expect it, but it's nice as no prophet or Christian has ever had the time or took it. You're a gentleman and a scholar.
A good book on the JFK assassination is, "Murder From Within" which definitely points the finger at LBJ for complicity in the killing. Word is that several days before the assassination LBJ said, "Soon I won't have to worry about those damn Kennedys anymore." Also, there is the revealing photo of LBJ getting sworn in as president in Air Force One while Jackie is weeping with her head in her hands and a U.S. Senator is winking at LBJ. Soon thereafter, America's military involvement in Vietnam began in earnest. No coincidence there. Bobby K. hated the mulatto, cross dressing fagot J.Edgar Hoover who ruled the FBI like Caesar ruled Rome. Hoover, who denied the Mob even existed while accepting lavish gifts from them. The whisper stream said Bobby used to barge into Hoover's office without knocking (something no one else would dare) walking 3 German Sheppards on leashes and saying very loudly, "Boy, do I hate queers!!" This would send Hoover into a paroxysm of rage. I have no doubt that Hoover was in on Bobby's murder along with his non-existent mafia friends. The CIA, along with its boss agency the Mossad, along with organized crime and the military industrial complex (more organized crime) all had a hand in capping JFK. At the top rungs of the power complex, big government, high finance, five star military brass, and criminal syndicates coalesce into one, huge indistinguishable blob of malfeasance. And of course we know which tribe wields the most influence. Above them, probably Satan. Sonny Bono was starched because he was making too many noises about Mob activity in his neck of the woods. Not something that prolongs one's lifespan. If RFK jr. is selected as president, he will have to don the yarmulke, kiss the Wailing Wall, and bend the knee to Hymie like everyone else. The "Kennedy Curse" leading to so many premature and violent deaths in that clan was triggered by old man Joe's unabashed and justified admiration of the greatest one of all, Adolph Hitler. I don't have to say who that outraged. Thanks for another gem, Don.
"Murder From Within" has some valuable research in it, but I don't believe it was ever published (perhaps privately). One of the drawbacks was the authors' contention that limo driver William Greer shot JFK. Others, including the late William Cooper, jumped on that bandwagon. Thanks.
There were three shooters and allegedly one of them was Charles Harrison, father of the famous actor Woody Harrelson. Another Mob, Intelligence, Entertainment connection a la Laurel Canyon. Charles Harrison was a stone cold, contract killer for the Mafia. He received a long stretch in prison for killing a federal judge who handed out draconian sentences to busted Mexican drug cartel members, the Cartel hiring Harrison for the Hit, so the story goes. He actually escaped the Slam at one point but didn't make it far from the walls before he was nabbed by prison security. He wound up dying there. Allegedly during one of Woody's visitations, he confessed to him his role in the Kennedy assassination. Thanks again, Don.
Yes, the Harrison story is interesting. That's what made me start paying attention to Woody Harrelson's work. He seems to gravitate to films with conspiratorial themes. Thanks, Hereticdrummer.
RFK was interesting, he went from a lawyer on the senate committee to ruthless campaign manager, to AG and then to Liberal U.S. Senator.
One question a bout RFK possibly becoming President in 1968 is could he? What would have been his policy about the Vietnam War, would he have found a way to get out or not? Nixon ran on getting us out of the war, not contain using it. What did RFK say about this, I don't remember. Like you I was a 12 year old kid then, but I had been following politics since I was 5, I remember JFK's Inauguration Speech like yesterday.
I don't view LBJ as bumbling, he was a crook of the highest order and the policy changes he made in the Senate as majority leader were terrible for our country to this day. May I recommend if you haven't read it, J. Evertts Haley's book on Johnson written in 1964 very telling on some of his crimes.
There was another book written within the last 3 or 4 years called "JFK vs Allen Dulles" by Greg Poulgrain, part of the reason for his assassination had to do with the money to be made from Malaysia and his foreign policy that would have blocked that. Allen Dulles was once a corporation lawyer for Standard Oil of New Jersey. I did some email correspondence with Greg Poulgrain and it was interesting, Someone you might want to talk to.
As for the CIA, the original charter for them was that they would report and be under the control of NSC, originally they were not to engage in Covert Operations, they were to take Intelligence from all then existing Intel Agencies, collate and analyze such and reprot to the NSC. The Dulles Brothers were the ones that found a way to circumvent the CIA charter to allow for Covert Operations and when Allen Dulles took over DCI he did with a vengeance. JFK fired him for a number of reasons.
Dulles was probably the point man for assassination of JFK and there is plenty of evidence to support that theory I think. Then of all things Dulles was put on the Warren Commission. Senator Richard Russell, who tried to get out of being on the commission, did not believe Oswald was a lone gunman or even the gunman at all. Russell was about the only member that went to Dallas on his own and went through the School Book Depository and personally got a rifle to see just what the view was from that window. He also wrote a 33 page dissension and rebuttal of the Warren Commission Finding and Conclusions. Russell was not fooled at all.
Allen Dulles, who ran the CIA "Operation Mockingbird", was a director of the Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) for 40 years. Richard Bissell was a CFR member. After JFK fired Dulles, he was replaced by John McCone, another CFR member. After JFK was killed, Dulles sat on the Warren Commission with John McCloy, then CFR chairman and former chairman of Rockefeller's Chase Bank.
After RFK Sr. was elected Senator, he joined the CFR in 1966 in anticipation of his presidential campaign. Dulles and McCloy were still CFR directors.
The liberal-fascist CFR and its network of corporations, foundations, NGOs, and captured govt agencies is the "invisible government" which has controlled US policy and the media since WW2. See charts: swprs.org/the-american-empire-and-its-media/
Great post, Stephen. I read and enjoyed Haley's book many years ago. Johnson's personality appeared bumbling, but as you point out he was as shrewd and corrupt as they come. I had Greg Poulgrain on my show a while back. Thanks!
Years ago I read the US Navy records about the sinking of PT-109 in the Pacific in WWII. JFK was skipper of the torpedo boat. A Japanese destroyer cut PT-109 in half in the Solomon Islands. JFK kept his crew alive. He would swim out at night into the shark infested waters with a lamp trying to flag down a Navy PT boat going by, but none came by.
Fortunately for JFK the current was circular where he was and brought him back to the small island where his crew were hiding.
Eventually brave natives of the islands found the crew and JFK was able to get out a rescue message to the Navy written on a coconut.
If you read David's comment below, you begin to understand the hatred the Kennedys engender in so many people. Regardless of whether he was careless or not, JFK made up for any of that (if it was even true), by displaying extraordinary courage in keeping his crew alive. How many men have ever had the fortitude to tug an injured man miles in the water, with the rope of his life preserver clutched between his teeth? He was a real war hero. Thanks.
Cashion; It was war. The Pt boats went out at night to attack Japanese barges that were supplying Japanese troops on Guadalcanal. The Japs had to do it at night as the USA had air superiority.
Timmy, don't feed the trolls. When they are ignored, they will wander off. The same can't be said for paid shills, but ignoring them as well shows readers that they aren't being made welcome.
Ed: I'm pretty bored. With my bad legs and all I can't do much out there in the world anymore so I play with the trolls. Reminds me of playing with those little blue troll dolls with the wild orange hair we had as kids.
But you are probably right. I'll go back to ignoring them.
Another great article by DJ. I've been down all the JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr. rabbit holes. Jacob Hornberger's books and articles on the JFK assassination are excellent. The James Douglass book on the JFK assassination is probably the best one.
As for when JFK was shot, I was 11 in Catholic school. It was the only time I saw nuns cry. The only time I saw them turn on the TV in the classroom. And the only time we were set free from school early.
As a kid I didn't care much about politics. Not until the Vietnam War military draft lottery tried to grab me.
But now that I'm old and look back at all the political bastards who screwed up my life, I get angry.
My opinion of LBJ is known.
I would dream of going to Texas, buy a 12 pack of Lone Star beer and go out to LBJ's grave. I would sit in a lawn chair by the grave and drink the beer getting up on occasion to piss on LBJ's grave.
I imagined my piss falling like Alien Acid Blood on LBJ's testicles in Hell.
Hey, I was 11 as well when JFK was killed. I think that people our age followed the citizen examinations of that murder in much greater numbers than most people knew. The CIA had to come up with a really stupid name for us: "conspiracy theorists".
I don't know of anyone who could see that there was indeed a huge conspiracy to kill the Kennedys who has ever changed their mind about it. My parents despised LBJ and his little circle of remoras. Mom used to always comment on how Ladybug would crane her neck or, in some other way, push herself into the frame to get her face on TV and in photos. Mom was disgusted by Ladybug.
LBJ was an evil psychopath, despised by a huge segment of the population. I've read several books about his criminal career.
Ed: And LBJ tried to kill the crew of the USS Liberty to get the USA into the Six-Day war and had planes with nukes on their way to Cairo when the Soviet spy plane saw the whole attack on USS Liberty by Israel. LBJ had to call of the nuclear raid on Cairo with the planes only twenty minutes from nuking the pyramids.
There was a Soviet sub with nukes in the Eastern Mediterranean. The captain had orders to nuke Jerusalem if Israel or anyone used nukes in the Six Day War. The Soviet nukes were targeted at the golden dome of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.
LBJ's mistress was Mossad. The White House was run by Mossad. LBJ was a murdering ass who almost started WWIII.
Just imagine the stark contrast between JFK, arguing with David Ben-Gurion about Israel developing a nuclear program, and his successor, who was called "the accidental president" back in the day, covering up the murder of American military forces by Israel. Thanks.
Yes he was. Both the Billie Sol Estes and Bobby Baker scandals were heating up. Evelyn Lincoln, JFK's personal secretary, claimed that he told her the last time he saw her that LBJ was being replaced on the '64 ticket. I don't think LBJ was the mastermind, or even the primary mover behind the assassination, but he certainly approved. Thanks.
Great read , i to am a Kennedy fanatic. I have a blue JFK hoodie I wear on weekends on dog walks.. JFK did not want Isreal to have nukes and insisted on inspection’s . Isreal duped the inspectors and carried on . All of us thinkers know the Mossad carried a big stick in the murder . Mossad attempted to murder everyone on US Liberty a few years later..Friends like that who needs enemies.
Yes, JFK was involved in a heated behind the scenes dispute with David Ben-Gurion over Israel developing nuclear weapons. Another thing about Old Joe Kennedy- he was considered anti- Semitic by all the usual suspects. He was an early critic of the Federal Reserve, and undoubtedly talked about this kind of thing with his children.
FDR made Joe Kennedy the first head of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Yes. Kennedy was frustrated by this, as he expected a more prominent position. Thanks.
The US LIberty event was done by LBJ. He set it up and made it happen. He loved playing war in his basement.
So tired of this eternal Liberty nonsense.
Here is a little dose of reality:
In 1967, in the middle of a hot war for their national survival against Arab attackers, USN Spy Ship, the Liberty was off the coast of Israel, relaying Israeli troop movements to Israel's Arab attackers.
That's how the Liberty earned it's fate.
Jew Haters really hate being confronted with this essential reality,yet after decades of mindless prattle, there is no getting around it:
1) Liberty was designed and commissioned as a Spy Ship.
2) There is no other justification or reason for them to be anchored off the Israeli coast.
3) There is no other reason for Israel to attack, no other advantage to be gained but stopping the Liberty from Betraying Israel.
4) The matter was hushed up as an " accident" and not prosecuted by the US government for only one logical reason: To keep US perfidy and betrayal hidden.
The Liberty was clearly marked as a U.S. vessel. Attacking it like that was a very strange thing for our "greatest ally" to do. Of course, our own perfidy had to be covered up, but that consisted primarily of concealing the attack in the first place, and our failure to hold Israel accountable. Do you think our government would have treated an attack on a U.S. ship- spying or not- by Egypt, Iran, Afghanistan, or any other nation too small to fight back effectively- just as cavalierly?
How do you become a "Jew hater" by talking about a military attack that cost U.S. lives, and was entirely covered up for decades? Juxtapose the absolute failure to even acknowledge this incident, against the fake attacks on the Maine in 1898, Lusitania to precipitate our entrance into WWI, Pearl Harbor in 1941, and the Gulf of Tonkin psyop that led to the disastrous escalation in Vietnam.
Here's the actual story regarding the USS Liberty, with supporting documentation: http://www.gtr5.com/summary_of_events.htm
"As a minimum, the attack must be condemned as an act of military recklessness reflecting wanton disregard for human life... The Secretary of State wishes to make clear that the United States Government expects the Government of Israel also to take the disciplinary measures which international law requires in the event of wrongful conduct by the military personnel of a State."
-- Letter from SecState Dean Rusk to the Israeli govt, 10-Jun-1967
"I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. Their sustained attack to disable and sink Liberty precluded an assault by accident or some trigger-happy local commander. Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous."
-- Former SecState Dean Rusk, Memoirs, 1990
Dean Risk ..sure you don't want China Joe's corrective perspective?
Actual press release from the Neo Con who engineered it is what you have posted here and it does less than zero
to address the reality of the easy to understand/ impossible to dispute points I raised.
The Liberty was never anything but a Spy Ship.and there is no justification for her presence.
She was spying, got caught, and paid the price.
May all Jew Haters share her fate.
Ahh, so they "deserved it". Just like JFK "deserved it".
Zapruder was a Jew who was a member of the Dallas Jewish Businessmen's Association that invited JFK to Dallas. Then just coincidentally he ends up directly at the spot where JFK is shot, with a movie camera no less. Not 50 or 100 or 200 feet away from the location of the hit, but spot on. Then, again coincidentally, Zapruder had a photo developing lab in his house where he could doctor the film to remove the section where the car slowed down to allow the assassins to get a better shot. The shooting spot was marked on the curb so the driver could see it. Then after doctoring the film he delivered it to the FBI.
The there is the report in Laurent Guyenot's book JFK-9/11 that Israeli's then Prime Minister, Golda Meir, was overheard by American intelligence on a phone call when a caller told her that Jack Ruby (Rubenstein) had killed Oswald, her reaction was: "Ovey! We're going to get caught!".
Today, our government has been taken over in an election coup covered up by a Scamdemic, and the midterm elections in 2022 once again rigged, and the citizenry continues to golf, watch football and soap operas, as if nothing has happened and will return to normal.
Machiavelli was wrong about conspiracies - he wrote that conspiracies are almost impossible to hide. In a modern mass media society, conspiracies are everyday events. And Evangelical Christians continue the mantra that we need to love the Jews and that the way to salvation is from the Jews. The Christian scriptures were forged a long time ago, and no one caught on then, or now.
I've never heard that Golda Meir comment before. The people who misrule us conspire instinctively. They don't know any other way. I get the "someone would have talked thing" all the time. Lots of people have talked. No one with any power will listen. Thanks.
Most of the early talkers didn't live long.
Wayne: I strongly suggest you read Jacob Hornberger's book about the Zapruder Film. Hornberger's book came out last year. It is very illuminating about what really happened to the film and the Zapruder family.
https://www.fff.org/store/an-encounter-with-evil-the-abraham-zapruder-story/
RFKjrenstein part 1. Kennedy, the "well-informed intellectual" is a climate cultist who believes that CO2 is our enemy, and supports the Green New Deal. He may not be as radical as the other climate cultists on the left, but he is "next of kin". His adherence to the cult of climate science targetting CO2 as the original sin, capable of flooding cities, and causing shifting weather patterns, leading us all down the path of the day-after-tomorrow apocalypse.... is as dangerous as the vaccine he opposes. Yet, with apocalypse NOW at our front door, he continues to fly private.
"Science" was the excuse for vaccine mandates. "Science" likewise is the excuse for the war against all things carbon, is a war against western society, and a war against prosperity. And the world and its energy sources are pretty much all traced to carbon in some form or fashion, and we would all be starving without it.
I wrote about this on my own substack, the world is fully dependent on Carbon. Still, RFKjrenstien issues threats...threats, albeit before he thought about running for POTUS....back in 2014.....there ought to be a law against the wrong think on "science" (where have I heard that before?), and three hots and a cot for the Koch brothers, I guess the intellectual giant, RFKjrenstein, missed the day they taught the bill-of-rights at law school.
I expected better of Donald Jeffires. As as one of his paid subscribers, there is a sucker born every minute. No worries, with RFKjrenstein's position on vaccination, nad vaccine mandates, there is not a snowballs chance in hell the Dem establishment will allow RFKjrenstein anywhere near the democrat nomination. He's a side show circus act.
I'm sorry I let you down, Arnold. Especially considering you are a generous paid subscriber. I told Sherri Tenpenny to tell him that he should address his past comments, especially the one about locking up climate change "deniers." I am getting sucked in, and should really know better. Thanks.
Even if we grant all of the RFK Jr. flaws pointed out by Arnold, it would still be good for the country if the far-more-flawed Biden were forced to debate with him.
On CO2 warming: it's real, but less serious than promoted by those looking for an excuse to regiment us. Why do I think it's real? 1) A physicist (on Quora, forgot the name) did a study that accounted for confounding errors (like taking the temperature near a heat exhaust vent) and found something like a 1 degree C warming due to CO2 over the past century or so; 2) CO2 warming predicts stratospheric heating; sun cycle-based warming predicts no stratospheric warming. We have stratospheric warming. I've heard that undersea volcanoes are heating the North Atlantic; a reminder that Mother Nature has the last word.
I appreciate your perspective, Greg. Even if RFK, Jr. has no chance, or is compromised, he is bringing issues to the table that no one else is. Like Trump, he serves a purpose in mentioning these things alone. Thanks.
We also know that the world has been far warmer in the past ( and far colder too) with considerably higher CO2 levels. Life still goes on. The elite prey on our natural human arrogance to convince us that we are almost God-like and thus can control the natural functions of this world. When you look for possible ulterior motives on behalf of the "zero carbon" promoters you will realize it all comes down to money and power. CO2 is one of the main building blocks of life itself. How have they managed to whip up so much panic over a necessity of life is beyond me.
Yes, "Climate Change" is one of their biggest myths. As a lifelong environmental activist, RFK, Jr. naturally gravitated to it. He should really examine the "science" behind it. I'd also like to see him comment on and visit the people in East Palestine, Ohio, site of a now forgotten recent ecological disaster. Thanks.
Since RFK, Jr. follows the evidence wherever it takes him, I’m certain he will question the climate change narrative at some point. At this moment he is saying that powerful interests are using climate scare tactics to push an agenda that will shovel even more wealth to the billionaire class. It’s his devotion to the truth that attracts me to his candidacy. No one else comes close to that standard.
The Government has been controlling weather for decades. There are patents, strategic papers going back years and years and people better versed than me allege the earthquake in Turkey was punishment for stepping out of line.
Climate change is a Psy Op, and does not reflect reality.
You might take a look at the opposition viewpoint.
People as credentialed as the Global Warming crowd state unequivocally that CO2 is not driving Global Warming or Climate Change and that it is in no way vaguely possible that it might.
We have stratospheric warming-- so what? How warm is the stratosphere? Minus 65C or so? Does anyone believe that minor warming of the stratosphere affects the surface?
Importantly, we have no signs of tropospheric warming as predicted. https://www.nsstc.uah.edu/aosc/testimonials/ChristyJR_Written_170329.pdf
The planetary climate is so complex that I doubt that any attempt to eliminate "confounding factors" would be anything less than hand-waving.
There really is no physical basic for the theory of CO2 catastrophe: no real evidence at all that it's happening. It's all theory and computer modeling, and real-word "evidence" that specializes in confusing causation.
Don't forget his past stance on the NRA being a terroist group. Does he really stand for the 2nd Amendment? Besides we do not elect our presidents! Check out Dr John Coleman and the Committee of 300! I for one do not Trust RFK Jr. or any politician. In a truly free world there is no government or slave masters to tell us how to live, eat and drink or think.
RFK, Jr.'s past comments reveal an independent spirit who nevertheless still accepted or supported many odious aspects of today's Left. I think he's changed. But you're right- we don't really elect anyone, so I'm probably wasting my time discussing politics. But I've been addicted to it since his father ran and was killed in '68. Like I've said, I'm a huge fan of Frank Capra. Thanks.
I agree with you that the votes aren't actually counted, and probably haven't been for many decades. I read an article in the 1980s that pointed out the impossibility of announcing a winner before all the polls closed in a presidential "election", so that isn't a new idea, just a reasonable one.
You might have read an excerpt from the late Collier brothers' fantastic expose, "Votescam." I covered the issue of electoral fraud in detail in "Hidden History." Thanks, Ed.
I read "Votescam" when it came out. The Colliers reported on the vote fraud by both parties, though they were democrat voters before realizing that voting didn't matter. It's one book that bears a revisitation from time to time, for sure.
LRC's Political Theatre today linked a story on Breitbart (and I don't particularly trust Breitbart) which says that RFKjr said he would sign a ban on "assault weapons" if it crossed his desk. The article doesn't link to the video source, so for what it's worth:
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment/2023/06/29/rfk-jr-says-he-would-sign-assault-weapons-ban-if-it-reached-his-desk/
That's a bit misleading. RFK, Jr. defended the Second Amendment, and questioned why anyone would want to take guns away from people. He was pressured by the typically biased "journalist" on News Nation to give the response she wanted. He eventually said that he would sign such a ban, if Democrats and Republicans agreed to it, and he was satisfied with it. He doesn't seem to make this issue a priority in his speeches. Thanks.
The article at Brietbart takes note of RFKjr's pro-2nd Amendment stance. I didn't really trust the article since they included a still shot from the interview, but didn't link to the video itself. Breitbart isn't on my list of trusted sites anyway.
There is no excuse for that, and it's hardly his only anti gun statement.
As wonderful as it would be to resurrect Camelot, he simply is not close to the man his father was.
Here's something you may not know: during the promotion of his Fauci Film, his organization sent me an offer to buy plans for a perpetual energy machine, certain to cut my electric bill in half.
When I pointed out that such is impossible and expressed my dismay at such a retarded scam, they doubled down and insisted it was real!
Just like people want to believe RFK Jr. is real.
No matter how you try to avoid it, you will continue to run up against one salient reality: He is a Lefty.
Actually, there is reason to believe that such energy devices might work. This goes back to John Keeley in the 1870s. Joe Newman invented such a device in the 1980s. He exhibited it at big arenas, but the FDA wouldn't approve it because it was "scientifically impossible." They could find no chicanery on his part, and the machine clearly worked. Nikola Tesla claimed to have found a way to provide free energy for all close to a century ago. The government sent John Trump, Donald's uncle, to confiscate his papers after he died, and no one has seen them since. Or talked about free energy. I wrote all about Stanley Meyer, who seemingly invented a way to power a car on tap water. He died under exceedingly strange circumstances, and his work disappeared like Tesla's. Powerful interests would never allow such an impact on their profits. I will have to look more into whatever I assume the energy company RFK, Jr. founded decades ago, to provide free heat to the poor, is talking about here. If anything, that would attract me more to his candidacy.
It's more in keeping with his philosophy as stated many times, though shockingly at odds with his campaign spiel.
When has that ever happened before.
I don't think it's a joke candidacy .
Biden's was a joke when he announced.
Leftys lack imagination, and China Joe has laughably tried to channel Trump's tough guy stance, as just one example of Leftys plagiarizing what they condemn.
I think they plan a variation on a 2016 theme, whereby RFK engenders a " Groundswell of Support", and thus the DNC convention is " forced" to nominate him.
Meanwhile, Trump supporters all over the net have been sucked in, and some are switching allegiance.
Demonrats have no other possibilities that can provoke that support.
" And I'll get on my knees and pray...We don't get fooled again"!
Meet the New Boss/Same as the Old Boss.
Though I've heard lots of conservatives defend RFK Jr as not being a climate fanatic like the rest of them, just about 3-4 months ago, on the Children's Health Defense site, RFK Jr posted a comment as "moderator" (I think he did it twice) talking about how "carbon is an existential threat to the planet"- same talking point as the rest of them. And he pleaded with the readers to not get sucked in by the propaganda. I think he truly believes in this climate change hoax and thinks he's smarter than those who think it is a hoax (there was definitely a condescending tone). So, for whatever reason, he knows the science is bought and paid for with the vaccines, but thinks the science is legit for the climate change hoax.
It's really kind of shocking when you think about it--I thought for sure when he saw that climate change was part of the Great Reset he would have realized he had been played. But nope, he still believes it. I give more credit to someone like Prof Mark Crispin Miller who used to be a big promoter of global warming, but has since changed his stance in light of new evidence and he even openly questioned the bizarre "forest" fires out in CA (fwiw- Peggy Hall recently had a tree forensics expert on to go over the evidence).
As for Joe Kennedy Sr, years ago when I looked into WW2 revisionism, I recall reading some interesting info on him, along the lines of him realizing who was behind the wars and communism. So, I searched for "joseph kennedy sr antisemite blamed jews for world war 2" and found some interesting info:
https://swisscows.com/en/web?query=joseph+kennedy+sr+antisemite+blamed+jews+for+world+war+2
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/697
I think JFK and RFK were both aware of the problem--I think at least RFK was trying to get AIPAc to register as a foreign lobby. And years ago, when I was first learning about zionism, I ran into info on Benjamin Freedman, who back in 1961 was warning that the zionists ruled over America like absolute monarchs. Anyway, I recall listening to a guy who was familiar with Freedman and he said that JFK actually met with Freedman. So, I think he was aware.
But it seems like the next generation is quite different. RFK Jr is very pro-Israel, and there was a strange post in one of the magazines about RFK Jr's son going to fight with Ukraine. Sage Hana on substack just did a post on it, but it looked like it was just a professional photo shoot and that maybe he didn't go over there at all.
I understand what you're saying, Sandra. He's been on the Left his whole life. But he has evolved, and is saying some things I never thought I'd hear a presidential candidate say. He could massively disappoint, like Trump (who also said some incredible things). It's extremely unlikely that he has a chance to be elected, given how the voters don't really control elections. Thanks.
I secretly agree with that assessment, but then I remember: American politics can take strange twists and maybe more importantly, we’re in an era unlike any before. I suppose one can say that about any historical period but, no, there is more at stake here than at any time in the past. So I can’t count RFK, Jr. Out. For example: he’s drawing huge support from conservatives.
Thanks for pointing this out for us, Arnold. Some would take it even further to characterize the entire presidential election "process" as a side show circus act effectively keeping the endlessly voting sheeple from perceiving the cliff dead ahead. By definition there is no voting your way out of a coup d' etat. Accordingly some states are coming to the realization that the union is lost and are forming their exit strategy in their noble endeavor for peace, love and freedom. Godspeed to them. ~~ j ~~ #Texit
I see the same thing, which is reflected in most of what I say and write. I explained why I'm pulled into the RFK, Jr. thing. I'm human, and as I keep saying, those Frank Capra films left me with some trace of hope. Thanks.
My circus act comment was specifically aimed at the fact you have an anti-"science"-anti-vaccine candidate in RFKjrenstien running as a Dem would be akin to any republican running being taken seriously while being anti-2A. There is not a snow-ball's chance. "Science" being a pejorative term, the government corrupted, non-falsifiable, computer based garbage-in, garbage-out BS that we have masquerading used by politicians, in collusion with academics, and corporations, and NGOs to enrich themselves, wildly, at our expense.
Yeah, got that and couldn't agree more, well said. Just thought I would take the circus metaphor and run with it to include the entire election charade ... which is certainly awakening many folks to the folly of trying to fix a broken, unfixable system. "Just because the circus has left town doesn't mean you got the monkey off your back."
~~ George Carlin
Arnold: Well, it doesn't really matter who wins the Presidency does it? The bureaucracies run the uSA.
Don't get too upset about any POTUS.
BTW, how's the Humvee running?
Don’t own one. I do own a ULEV that I average 4000 miles per year with as I work from home.
I bought that car used. I’ve taken zero vacations the last 4 years. I have had 1 business flight the last 4 years. I’m just guessing my carbon footprint is a tiny tiny fraction of RFKjrensteins, Al Gore’s, or John Kerry’s who work to profit off climate change fear and hysterics. I work for a profit making employer producing products, paying enormous sums of taxes. I come from no wealth. My father died when I was three. My mother lived paycheck to paycheck. I worked my way through undergrad and graduate school. The last thing I want is another green energy ideologue (a grift) in office who grew up with all the advantages I never had, and pushes the green new deal based on really bad science for his benefit and his name, only to impoverish the rest of us. There are more than one way to cull humanity other than vaccines.
Arnold: My comment was a joke. Arnold Schwarzenegger is known by the name "Arnold".
I'm no green energy idealogue. I live in California and pay up the ass for energy.
I agree. Climate fanaticism is every bit as bad as Covid fanaticism. Both are based on complete pseudoscience.
How does such a well-read man fall for such pseudoscience? That's the question every one of us should ask.
But ... I can see a path forward for Kennedy if the media slowly begins to see that his stance on vaccines was right, and he was right about Covid, and my God we're winning!!! (Do I perceive another narrative raising its head?) Praise be. The left accepts him because he's a climate fanatic and the right accepts him because he's revealed everything. Praise be! Lead us on, Mr. President.
Meanwhile, Klaus and friend are rubbing their hands with glee... oh goody! Climate tyranny! The Mother of All Emergencies! Just have to flatten that curve for three years ... think Kennedy will be able to resist the temptation to save the very planet for future generations?? With his climate advisors whispering in his ear about necessary measures? And the left insisting that he impose harsh measures to save the children and baby animals of the future?
Never mind. I'm sure those folks who brought us a plandemic never thought of anything like this. Surely they never anticipated that maybe people would catch on to the Covid scam and they'd have to pivot to accomplish their end game. Or maybe the plan is much bigger and more elaborate than we imagined?
Freedom requires vigilance. Vigilance requires imagination. Yes or no? I've heard exactly nothing from Kennedy to indicate that he's anything but a climate fanatic. Let that raw fact sink in.
If he weren't a climate fanatic and if he were instead attacking climate pseudoscience as well as pharma pseudoscience, what does that consideration tell us? Then the left would reject him completely. Maybe there really is a pivot going on, and Kennedy may be an unwilling dupe? And, the perfect man for the job?
Freedom requires imagination, to imagine the possible trajectories of what might be happening, and to ensure that those trajectories that inhibit the path of personal freedom and individual self-determination are not the path being set forward, by calling them out and insisting that these avenues be cut off.
I concur with those pointing to Israel /Mossad as the entity responsible for JFK'S murder. They had help of course, from the CIA, the Meyer Lanskey crime syndicate and for added intrigue, a French connection.
JFK was sincerely anti-war, especially with the nuclear threat. Israel on the other hand, would not let anything, or anyone, stand in their way in acquiring the bomb. Never Again.
The three fundamental elements to consider in developing suspects of a crime are, motive, means and opportunity. For me, the entities cited above satisfy all three criteria more than the myriad of other theories.
RFK Jr must know this (JFK Jr apparently did). But he can't say so due to the threat of meeting a similar fate.
As hard as it might be to admit, can't we face the fact that ALL of our presidents have been and still are controlled. JFK was probably our last independent president.
And how can we have any confidence in the election process itself? From hanging chad's to Diebold machines to ballot harvesting to you name it, election integrity has become a contradiction in terms.
Politics is a necessary evil but I no longer look to it as the source of the solutions that this world needs. We fight not against flesh and blood............
Good points, Gary. I believe JFK was the last president who thought he was actually in charge. The electoral process is completely rigged, but they really don't need to commit that much fraud, given the demographic changes and dumbing down of the public. We don't like to face it, but there are millions of Americans out there who will actually vote for these cretins. Thanks.
I could definitely be wrong, but I think that Trump actually thought he was in charge at first, but then he quickly realized that wasn't the case, like when he had to get his cabinet approved and realized that the deep state swamp rats in the Senate had all the power. And I think he initially tried to stick with his America First foreign policy, but all of the Russia hoaxes and constant attacks were to put pressure on him until he caved. Mike Whitney had a good article on how this played out--posted at Unz, something like "Tit for Tat, Why did Mueller let Trump off the hook?" And there was recently a good article by left-leaning Christian Parenti (son of Professor Michael Parenti), where he made a good case that the reason they went after Trump was because he tried to dismantle the empire): https://compactmag.com/article/trump-s-real-crime-is-opposing-empire
So, I still think Trump tried, but I just think it is impossible for one man to take back the nation from this level of corruption. The neocon deep state swamp rats in the Senate would never approve of anyone for Secretary of HHS who is not controlled by pharma, and they would never approve of anyone for Sec of Defense who isn't controlled by the MIC.
I truly don't know how we get out of this mess.
Sandra, I agree with Gary that there is no political solution and I think that if we get out of this mess it will be despite our best efforts.
Yeah, I don't see a political solution at all. I'm kind of thinking that we need a miracle.
I recently listened to a the video below with Rob Kientz, who has a 25 year background in tech, and it sounds like their digital slave grid agenda is moving forward quickly and I don't really see any opposition (govt is captured and in on it). Kientz says they are building the new system on top of the old, visa/mastercard are in on it, and they may have a way of hooking you into the new system without you even knowing it at first (George Gammon has said something similar):
Blueprint for the End of The Dollar and the BRICS New Currency
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6Lw_eMfYW8
Bottom line: I think we need a miracle. I keep trying to spread the word, but I'm in a blue state and most here are beyond clueless.
We need God. Only a supernatural force could possibly clean up this kind of systemic corruption. Thanks.
Have you read Jonathan Cahn’s book “The Return of the Gods”?
Yes, I agree.
fwiw- If anyone here is in Tennessee, this woman is trying to organize people:
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/us-house-floats-bill-to-defund-who/comment/17974895
Funny how the Republicans propose all these good bills when there is no chance for them to get passed and then when they do have control of both houses of Congress they sell us out every time. There is no way the Senate will pass any of this and if they do Biden will never sign it. We have seen this play many times over the years. When the Rs have control they do nothing and cave to the left every time. Only when they have no power to make anything happen do they put forward good legislation the American people want and America needs. The federal government IS NOT THE SOLUTION. They have all been selling us out for decades and that includes both R and D. The only peaceful solution is state Nullification. Join us at: tncss.substack.com and website: tncss.weebly.com. We have legislation that provides a process for invoking Nullification.
Great comment Wayne:
Otto Cahn ( very rich jew) bankrolled Cyrus Schofield in early 20th century to promote & publish the first dispensational rapture doctrine with the hugely printed Schofield reference Bible in London . The new Bible was distributed to all US Bible colleges and schools --you must bless gods chosen people , you must bless Isreal by giving $$$$ and taking tours, if you do all this there will be a secret rapture for you when times get tough...
Hasn’t worked out so well for us. 50 million brainwashed Christian Zionist, the most duped among us all.
Spot on, Brad. Sadly, not many folks knew about the propaganda role of the Schofield Bible, up until fairly recently. Because Zionist Christians are so dumb, and so utterly lacking in spiritual discernment, a large number are now dying from the Jonestown jab. Already I feel their influence weakening.
It does feel like a softening , I’ve lost 2 long term friends because of this silly false doctrine and there universal support of Isreal .. I won’t waiver from the truth..It’s always the same fellas that create all the crisis . Larry Finkelstein BlackRock and on and on.
I went to Catholic school as a kid. By the age of 6 I knew the priests and nuns were full of shit. Why do adults believe in any of this mumbo-jumbo?
Old Joe was pretty damn wise on any number of subjects. He would have been a HUGE improvement over FDR for 12 years..He wasn’t owned by the money changers.
He was close friends with Joe McCarthy and James Forrestal, both of whom were murdered by the Deep State at Bethesda Naval Hospital. I will have lots more on just how dishonestly McCarthy's record has been misrepresented in the next volume of Hidden History. Thanks.
DJ: I read the book about Forrestal's murder. What a sad figure he is.
I quote Forrestal's great line to his friend Joe McCarthy quite a bit. He said, "McCarthy, if this wasn't some huge conspiracy, once in a while they'd make a mistake in our favor." Thanks.
Wow, didn't know about that quote. Very interesting!
Wow, I never knew that McCarthy was killed at Bethesda Naval Hospital too. And I thought I was aware of all the intrigues.
Well, he went in for a problem with his knee, and died two days later at age 49. There was no autopsy, which is the standard in many of these cases. Thanks.
Excellent article once again. Very well put and I'm with you 100pc. I'll be looking forward to your next book.
Thanks, Norman!
I can remember exactly when they announced the JFK assassination.
We were driving home and the news came on the car radio.
My mother said, "Oh NO, They shot Kennedy"!
She started crying and it was lucky we just had a half mile to go. I was just 3 yrs old.
It's pretty amazing the ability to make a mental note of such events such that it really is indelible.
Sorry to not join in on the Kennedy train, but he seems to have too many flaws.
He has allegedly had many affairs, which means he has issues around sexual/marital fidelity; not just making him a bad role model (if true) but also a surefire blackmail target. As a libertarian I don't
usually care about others' private business, but I'm not going to vote for it either. There are some pretty interesting theories about demonic influences which I tend to agree with in a general sense.
If I vote for a candidate, then he had better give the impression of having angelic influences and not
Luciferian. Kennedy can still fight against the big pharmakeia, and that's wonderful, more power to him. I just don't see any political solution to our current spiritual crisis. It may be that we need to solve the spiritual problems first, and then the political and institutional side will resolve itself.
(which comes first? cart or horse?)
I don't know that we've ever had an angelic-like candidate, Scott. The best we can hope for at this point, at least to me, is clearly RFK, Jr. I think he's wrong on some important issues, but he's also right on a few crucial ones. There probably is no political solution to this mess. As Bob Dylan once wrote, "The pump don't work cause the vandals took the handles." The vandals took our handles a long time ago. The little boy in me, who cried when RFK was killed in 1968, is obviously what is moving me at this point. Thanks.
The fact that RFK Jr. is an avid historian is what makes him so dangerous to the ruling elite. The first thing totalitarian regimes do is rewrite history, which is what is happening now in 'Western Democracies". In reality none of us really know for sure what happened in the past as the victors have always rewritten history. However, in spite of this, that pesky thing truth always has a way of surviving. Truth is what evil people truly fear which is why they hate a man like RFK Jr. so vehemently.
RFK, Jr. isn't perfect- he seems to accept the conventional view of Lincoln and FDR, for example. But he is more informed, about history and current affairs, than all the other politicians put together. He doesn't use sound bites- he explains what he's saying, and cites sources. Most Americans are historically illiterate, so this probably won't win him any votes. Thanks, Peter.
I don't know how many of you own JFK's "Profiles In Courage." It's a book every American (or American at heart) should own, and I've always believed that an updated edition should include a final chapter dedicated to Jack. This moving tribute from Don will do, although it won't be read by our Body Idiotic and it's brutally clear that he died in vain, like Han Solo strangled by Jabba the Hut and trampled with a supercilious sneer. All because he wouldn't "smoke the big cigar."
Has anyone out there read what Brian Desborough has said about the assassination? Google his essay "Stop Misleading the Children, Mr. Jennings "; the shape charge seems to me the "real" solution although there were many shooters.
Thanks, Don, for some eye-opening and exquisitely written real history. It's a perfectly timed antidote, for me, to some of the merciless trashings Dry Throat (honorary Native American title) is being administered by Dr. Shiva and others I don't listen to. I'm sure the whole truth is somewhere in between, but anybody risking their life for truth these days deserves respect and admiration.
...Although Shiva claims that the man says one thing and does another and that his voice is a throat chakra disconnect because his words and actions don't line up. Strange.
Listen to the Pogues' "The Broad Majestic Shannon" for another "toast" to Jack.
The mantra that JFK didn't really write "Profiles in Courage" is yet another anti-Kennedy slur. JFK never wanted to go into politics- he wanted to be a writer. He was very literate and well- read, and unlike most politicians was thoroughly capable of writing his own material. Ted Sorensen worked with him regularly, but was no ghostwriter.
One of the heroes in "Profiles in Courage" was Republican Sen. Robert Taft, whom JFK extolled for criticizing the heinous Nuremberg Trials, which represented an ugly precedent in "justice." Never before had the victors of a war put the losers on trial in a courtroom. Now, almost all Americans think of Nuremberg as the ultimate form of justice. It certainly wasn't that way at the time, and JFK himself spoke out against it. I've been amazed I didn't catch more heat by exposing the Nuremberg Trials for what they were in my book "Crimes and Cover-Ups in American Politics: 1776-1963." Thanks!
I appreciate the kind words, William. RFK's voice condition is a hereditary disorder, not some "chakra." Listen to his grandmother Rose Kennedy talk. She had the same thing. So does one of RFK Jr.'s sisters. Thanks.
I do feel sorry for him, in a human sense and as a painful reminder that even if he had some long shot at the Presidency, it makes him look weak and uncharismatic, and he will be killed before he even receives the nomination, if necessary.
If you have time, I'd love to know what you think of Desborough. You must have heard of him or read his famous stuff. He claims to be ex-DARPA; his statement on Kennedy's autopsy being Tippett is obviously true.
Don't know if you read the article in Paranoia some years ago, but you're quite correct that Chappaquiddick was another spook op to keep Teddy from any Throne thoughts or public support. Could the Jesuits be more vicious?
The Pogues song is "Thousands Are Sailing" , not the other song from the same album.
If you're referring to the idea that officer J.D. Tippit was actually JFK, or whatever that theory involves, I'm afraid I can't buy into that. Imho, it's in the same category as Greer shooting JFK, or the Secret Service "accidentally" killing him, or Ruby not actually shooting Oswald, among others. Thanks.
I don't mean that Tippett was killed in Kennedy's place. He was used as a double to avoid any real autopsy, to provide a pretext for arresting Oswald, and possibly to buy time to plant the rifle in the depository. As I said, read Desborough's essay if you're interested. I wouldn't be sharing this if you didn't seem to care.
I'd love to hear any skeptic's explanation for an officer well known as a Kennedy lookalike receiving a call to go to a certain area and winding up slain on the very same day as the President. I guess the madman had to wipe out everybody resembling him. Even Wikipedia acknowledges the historicity of his highly suspicious death while giving out, of course, a completely false narrative to surround it.
I'm not one of those people who are going to ridicule anyone else's views, William. I find it hard to believe, but who knows? We've been lied to about everything. Thanks.
Would you care to hear why I don't believe that Paul McCartney was replaced? There are two reasons, both manifestly massive to my mind: 1.) The "new" Paul was better than the old, in fact seems to follow a perfect arc of musical improvement, to which he was always dedicated; and 2.) The feud that broke up the band was far too nasty to be counterfeit. After watching a relatively recent interview on YouTube in which he quickly shot out "John did" when he was asked who broke up the band, and in another place reading that John requested a "divorce", the songs Paul wrote after convincing the Boys to make one more-- on "Abbey Road"-- I believe barely sublimate a startling rage at John, his "wife" for so many years. More than that, "MacSwell's Silver Hammer" is (sublimated, as I said) an outright murder fantasy with the metaphysical "Joan" the victim. "Oh, Darling!" is the shriekout of a lover scorned. "Carry That Weight" has no real meaning unless John is That Boy. The "Weight" is the guilt for breaking up the world's biggest band.
If there is any real evidence that Paul died on 9/11/66 ('67, according to Juan O'Savin, who has some valuable inside information but doesn't always know what he's talking about), I'd love to see it. The only evidence that makes me consider this farfetched fantasy based on some lucubrative stoner well lubricated is the clip of George calling Paul "Faul". So I keep an open mind. If there was a body switch, though, they put the old soul into a new body. They probably have that technology.
Thank you kindly for responding. I don't always expect it, but it's nice as no prophet or Christian has ever had the time or took it. You're a gentleman and a scholar.
A good book on the JFK assassination is, "Murder From Within" which definitely points the finger at LBJ for complicity in the killing. Word is that several days before the assassination LBJ said, "Soon I won't have to worry about those damn Kennedys anymore." Also, there is the revealing photo of LBJ getting sworn in as president in Air Force One while Jackie is weeping with her head in her hands and a U.S. Senator is winking at LBJ. Soon thereafter, America's military involvement in Vietnam began in earnest. No coincidence there. Bobby K. hated the mulatto, cross dressing fagot J.Edgar Hoover who ruled the FBI like Caesar ruled Rome. Hoover, who denied the Mob even existed while accepting lavish gifts from them. The whisper stream said Bobby used to barge into Hoover's office without knocking (something no one else would dare) walking 3 German Sheppards on leashes and saying very loudly, "Boy, do I hate queers!!" This would send Hoover into a paroxysm of rage. I have no doubt that Hoover was in on Bobby's murder along with his non-existent mafia friends. The CIA, along with its boss agency the Mossad, along with organized crime and the military industrial complex (more organized crime) all had a hand in capping JFK. At the top rungs of the power complex, big government, high finance, five star military brass, and criminal syndicates coalesce into one, huge indistinguishable blob of malfeasance. And of course we know which tribe wields the most influence. Above them, probably Satan. Sonny Bono was starched because he was making too many noises about Mob activity in his neck of the woods. Not something that prolongs one's lifespan. If RFK jr. is selected as president, he will have to don the yarmulke, kiss the Wailing Wall, and bend the knee to Hymie like everyone else. The "Kennedy Curse" leading to so many premature and violent deaths in that clan was triggered by old man Joe's unabashed and justified admiration of the greatest one of all, Adolph Hitler. I don't have to say who that outraged. Thanks for another gem, Don.
"Murder From Within" has some valuable research in it, but I don't believe it was ever published (perhaps privately). One of the drawbacks was the authors' contention that limo driver William Greer shot JFK. Others, including the late William Cooper, jumped on that bandwagon. Thanks.
There were three shooters and allegedly one of them was Charles Harrison, father of the famous actor Woody Harrelson. Another Mob, Intelligence, Entertainment connection a la Laurel Canyon. Charles Harrison was a stone cold, contract killer for the Mafia. He received a long stretch in prison for killing a federal judge who handed out draconian sentences to busted Mexican drug cartel members, the Cartel hiring Harrison for the Hit, so the story goes. He actually escaped the Slam at one point but didn't make it far from the walls before he was nabbed by prison security. He wound up dying there. Allegedly during one of Woody's visitations, he confessed to him his role in the Kennedy assassination. Thanks again, Don.
Yes, the Harrison story is interesting. That's what made me start paying attention to Woody Harrelson's work. He seems to gravitate to films with conspiratorial themes. Thanks, Hereticdrummer.
My favorite work of Woody's is "True Detective", an HBO series, with Matthew McConaughey.
RFK was interesting, he went from a lawyer on the senate committee to ruthless campaign manager, to AG and then to Liberal U.S. Senator.
One question a bout RFK possibly becoming President in 1968 is could he? What would have been his policy about the Vietnam War, would he have found a way to get out or not? Nixon ran on getting us out of the war, not contain using it. What did RFK say about this, I don't remember. Like you I was a 12 year old kid then, but I had been following politics since I was 5, I remember JFK's Inauguration Speech like yesterday.
I don't view LBJ as bumbling, he was a crook of the highest order and the policy changes he made in the Senate as majority leader were terrible for our country to this day. May I recommend if you haven't read it, J. Evertts Haley's book on Johnson written in 1964 very telling on some of his crimes.
There was another book written within the last 3 or 4 years called "JFK vs Allen Dulles" by Greg Poulgrain, part of the reason for his assassination had to do with the money to be made from Malaysia and his foreign policy that would have blocked that. Allen Dulles was once a corporation lawyer for Standard Oil of New Jersey. I did some email correspondence with Greg Poulgrain and it was interesting, Someone you might want to talk to.
As for the CIA, the original charter for them was that they would report and be under the control of NSC, originally they were not to engage in Covert Operations, they were to take Intelligence from all then existing Intel Agencies, collate and analyze such and reprot to the NSC. The Dulles Brothers were the ones that found a way to circumvent the CIA charter to allow for Covert Operations and when Allen Dulles took over DCI he did with a vengeance. JFK fired him for a number of reasons.
Dulles was probably the point man for assassination of JFK and there is plenty of evidence to support that theory I think. Then of all things Dulles was put on the Warren Commission. Senator Richard Russell, who tried to get out of being on the commission, did not believe Oswald was a lone gunman or even the gunman at all. Russell was about the only member that went to Dallas on his own and went through the School Book Depository and personally got a rifle to see just what the view was from that window. He also wrote a 33 page dissension and rebuttal of the Warren Commission Finding and Conclusions. Russell was not fooled at all.
Allen Dulles, who ran the CIA "Operation Mockingbird", was a director of the Rockefeller's Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) for 40 years. Richard Bissell was a CFR member. After JFK fired Dulles, he was replaced by John McCone, another CFR member. After JFK was killed, Dulles sat on the Warren Commission with John McCloy, then CFR chairman and former chairman of Rockefeller's Chase Bank.
After RFK Sr. was elected Senator, he joined the CFR in 1966 in anticipation of his presidential campaign. Dulles and McCloy were still CFR directors.
The liberal-fascist CFR and its network of corporations, foundations, NGOs, and captured govt agencies is the "invisible government" which has controlled US policy and the media since WW2. See charts: swprs.org/the-american-empire-and-its-media/
Great post, Stephen. I read and enjoyed Haley's book many years ago. Johnson's personality appeared bumbling, but as you point out he was as shrewd and corrupt as they come. I had Greg Poulgrain on my show a while back. Thanks!
Years ago I read the US Navy records about the sinking of PT-109 in the Pacific in WWII. JFK was skipper of the torpedo boat. A Japanese destroyer cut PT-109 in half in the Solomon Islands. JFK kept his crew alive. He would swim out at night into the shark infested waters with a lamp trying to flag down a Navy PT boat going by, but none came by.
Fortunately for JFK the current was circular where he was and brought him back to the small island where his crew were hiding.
Eventually brave natives of the islands found the crew and JFK was able to get out a rescue message to the Navy written on a coconut.
JFK was a brave man. He was a leader of men.
The rest of the politicians are cowards.
If you read David's comment below, you begin to understand the hatred the Kennedys engender in so many people. Regardless of whether he was careless or not, JFK made up for any of that (if it was even true), by displaying extraordinary courage in keeping his crew alive. How many men have ever had the fortitude to tug an injured man miles in the water, with the rope of his life preserver clutched between his teeth? He was a real war hero. Thanks.
I ever looked into why his PT boat was out there in the 1st place.
He should have been court marshaled.
Cashion; It was war. The Pt boats went out at night to attack Japanese barges that were supplying Japanese troops on Guadalcanal. The Japs had to do it at night as the USA had air superiority.
Do your homework, dude.
Sure
Cashion: Sure what? Going back to the thread to know WTF you are talking about is a pain in the ass.
Timmy, don't feed the trolls. When they are ignored, they will wander off. The same can't be said for paid shills, but ignoring them as well shows readers that they aren't being made welcome.
Ed: I'm pretty bored. With my bad legs and all I can't do much out there in the world anymore so I play with the trolls. Reminds me of playing with those little blue troll dolls with the wild orange hair we had as kids.
But you are probably right. I'll go back to ignoring them.
Another great article by DJ. I've been down all the JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr. rabbit holes. Jacob Hornberger's books and articles on the JFK assassination are excellent. The James Douglass book on the JFK assassination is probably the best one.
As for when JFK was shot, I was 11 in Catholic school. It was the only time I saw nuns cry. The only time I saw them turn on the TV in the classroom. And the only time we were set free from school early.
As a kid I didn't care much about politics. Not until the Vietnam War military draft lottery tried to grab me.
But now that I'm old and look back at all the political bastards who screwed up my life, I get angry.
My opinion of LBJ is known.
I would dream of going to Texas, buy a 12 pack of Lone Star beer and go out to LBJ's grave. I would sit in a lawn chair by the grave and drink the beer getting up on occasion to piss on LBJ's grave.
I imagined my piss falling like Alien Acid Blood on LBJ's testicles in Hell.
Hey, I was 11 as well when JFK was killed. I think that people our age followed the citizen examinations of that murder in much greater numbers than most people knew. The CIA had to come up with a really stupid name for us: "conspiracy theorists".
I don't know of anyone who could see that there was indeed a huge conspiracy to kill the Kennedys who has ever changed their mind about it. My parents despised LBJ and his little circle of remoras. Mom used to always comment on how Ladybug would crane her neck or, in some other way, push herself into the frame to get her face on TV and in photos. Mom was disgusted by Ladybug.
LBJ was an evil psychopath, despised by a huge segment of the population. I've read several books about his criminal career.
Ed: And LBJ tried to kill the crew of the USS Liberty to get the USA into the Six-Day war and had planes with nukes on their way to Cairo when the Soviet spy plane saw the whole attack on USS Liberty by Israel. LBJ had to call of the nuclear raid on Cairo with the planes only twenty minutes from nuking the pyramids.
There was a Soviet sub with nukes in the Eastern Mediterranean. The captain had orders to nuke Jerusalem if Israel or anyone used nukes in the Six Day War. The Soviet nukes were targeted at the golden dome of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.
LBJ's mistress was Mossad. The White House was run by Mossad. LBJ was a murdering ass who almost started WWIII.
Just imagine the stark contrast between JFK, arguing with David Ben-Gurion about Israel developing a nuclear program, and his successor, who was called "the accidental president" back in the day, covering up the murder of American military forces by Israel. Thanks.
DJ: LBJ was going to be indicted for various crimes (maybe even murder) when JFK was killed. That was very convenient for the accidental president.
Yes he was. Both the Billie Sol Estes and Bobby Baker scandals were heating up. Evelyn Lincoln, JFK's personal secretary, claimed that he told her the last time he saw her that LBJ was being replaced on the '64 ticket. I don't think LBJ was the mastermind, or even the primary mover behind the assassination, but he certainly approved. Thanks.
Lol. I'm pretty sure you weren't the only one dreaming of doing that, Timmy. Thanks.
Can hardly wait Donald , I signed up on a annual with you the other day..Excellent forum you have here.
Thanks, Brad!