Tucker Carlson Exposes the January 6 Big Lie
Attacked and gagged by the tolerant lovers of "democracy"
On Monday, March 7, Fox News star Tucker Carlson produced the most incredible mainstream journalism I have ever seen. Using snippets from the 44,000 hours of suppressed video filmed on January 6, 2021, Carlson absolutely destroyed the official “insurrectionist” fairy tale with irrefutable documentation.
The so-called QAnon Shaman, Jacob Chansley, was shown strolling casually through the Capitol building, accompanied by no other “insurrectionists.” He was, however, escorted by a gaggle of very accommodating Capitol police officers. They can even be seen trying to open locked doors for him. Then he played a clip of Chansley reciting a prayer in the Senate chamber, in which he thanked police for being so polite and helpful. It’s kind of hard to continue to paint this guy as the face of the “insurrection,” given all the footage that blatantly refutes that. Chansley was sentenced to four years in prison. And the cops strolling around with him weren’t accessories after the fact.
Yes, I know that many believe Chansley is an agent himself. But if he’s really serving four years for doing nothing criminal, then I’m sure he regrets getting into undercover government work. Seems like Ray Epps got the gold standard deal there. And, of course, most in the alternative world view Tucker Carlson even more suspiciously. I am fully aware of his bow-tied, 9/11 truth-bashing background. I’ve seen him interview lone nut disinformation specialist Gerald Posner respectfully. But he’s been producing increasingly important work now for five years or so. Is he compromised? Has he been chosen to dole out bits of truth, the ultimate controlled opposition?
Certainly that is very possible. After all, given the rest of Fox News’s programming, Carlson’s populist-tinged show stands out with great distinction. Maybe he’s becoming our new Immanuel Goldstein, Orwell’s fake opposition leader in 1984. As some of you may know, I often called Donald Trump Goldstein as well. But in many respects, Carlson has gone way beyond Trump’s rhetoric. He makes his points in a powerful, articulate fashion, unlike the bumbling street talker Trump. Carlson would be hard to beat in a debate. Like Trump, he has accumulated all the right enemies. He is being attacked mercilessly for airing the January 6 footage.
As I’ve said before regarding Trump, or Alex Jones, or anyone else whom most in the alternative media view skeptically, to put it mildly, Tucker Carlson isn’t the story here. The footage is. And the fact that, from what he aired Monday alone, the elite have been caught with their pants down. If “QAnon Shaman” is the face of the “insurrection,” what does the undeniable footage of him in the Capitol say about that “insurrection?” That alone destroys the narrative. In a country with a halfway intelligent population, this kind of evidence would result in a massive repudiation of those pushing these kinds of lies. They’d all be voted out of office.
But they’re never voted out of office. Whether the votes aren’t being counted, or the majority of voters are just hopelessly stupid, they remain in power. And they’ll remain in power after their Shaman bogeyman has been exposed as a nonviolent character, whom the police were perfectly comfortable with. The reaction to the video on the part of both the Deep State, and the comatose sheeple who support it, has been as disillusioning as anything that happened during the COVID psyop. It’s another indication of how badly we’re outnumbered. These people will never be convinced by any video footage. Instead, they are listening to the media prompts, like Pavlov’s dogs.
One would think that the best evidence possible is a clear filmed documentation of the event in question. But that didn’t matter to the brain-dead jury that acquitted the police officers who beat homeless man Kelly Thomas to death. Despite the entire crime being taped on film, and the obvious fact that Thomas put up no resistance whatsoever, that jury ignored the evidence. As George Orwell wrote in 1984, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” This is what our leaders are doing. And it’s never been more obvious than in the case of the January 6 footage.
We used to make fun of the satirical quote, “Who are you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?” Every journalist in the mainstream media, and almost every politician in both “competing” parties are saying essentially that, in regards to the January 6 footage. Carlson has been accused repeatedly of deceptive editing, and even “lying” about what is being shown. All the big organs in our “free press” are maintaining that by airing this footage, Carlson is helping to destroy our “democracy.” You know, that thing invented by the ancient Greeks, best exemplified in our present world by the actor turned president of Ukraine, who has banned all opposition parties. Democracy.
Also on Monday, Carlson destroyed a couple of other integral parts of the dishonest “insurrectionist” narrative. They found footage of officer Brian Sicknick inside the Capitol, with his helmet on and appearing just fine, happily waving the unarmed “insurrectionists” further into the building. Despite this, our leaders and their mouthpieces in the state controlled media continue to declare that “five police officers died” during the “insurrection.” Sicknick died the next day, from a stroke. He wasn’t hit in the head with a fire extinguisher, no matter how many degenerate politicians and Mockingbird “journalists” claim he was.
Republican Senator Josh Hawley was ridiculed by the usual suspects, and called a coward, for running out of the Capitol that day. But Carlson found the entire footage, which showed that countless politicians were running out of the building, with Hawley actually in the back of the line. That was all in one show. And such a furor erupted, causing Democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer to demand Fox News stop Carlson from showing any more of this toxic footage. Watching Tuesday’s, and especially Wednesday’s shows, it seems pretty obvious that Rupert Murdoch ordered Tucker to back off. They simply can’t have this stuff seen by millions.
Sharyl Attkisson, one of the few decent journalists in this country, tweeted yesterday that she’d heard Fox News was trying to stop Carlson from airing more footage. Sharyl has been on my show a few times, so you know she’s the real deal. If you don’t know, Sharyl lost a lucrative career on television when CBS fired her over her reporting on the WHO lies about the Swine Flu in 2009. So that’s what happens when one of their reporters wanders off the reservation. Is that what might be happening with Tucker? Alex Jones and others claim that he was saving the truly explosive stuff for later in the week. But of course most think Alex Jones is a disinfo agent, too.
My son John, who is the only awake member of my family and the only one with an interest in my work, likes to say that the alternative media doesn’t know how to accept a win. The highest rated news program on television airing footage that absolutely demolishes the January 6 false narrative is a big win. A big, big win. Even if Tucker is compromised, some really illuminating information has been revealed, potentially waking up a lot of new people. Right now, my friend Gary McBride, whose work I have promoted a lot (interviewed him in American Free Press), is on the Alex Jones Show. He’ll be back on tomorrow. Gary has analyzed this footage like no one else.
In fact, Gary is probably going to be back on my show “I Protest” this Friday. That’s how close we are all connected. And why it’s such a shame that there is so much distrust and division in the alt media. Probably some will no longer trust Gary after his being on Infowars. We all have to support each other. Also on my show this Friday will be Marco, the Angry Tiger with a great new podcast the Tiger’s Den, Jason Barker from the Knights of the Storm, an important podcast with great production values, and Six from the New Prisoners Podcast, another important show. America Unplugged, David Knight, Gard Goldsmith- we need to support them all.
There is rumored to be far more video of Ray Epps, that incriminates him beyond any doubt. Epps is a key here; while they have tracked down and imprisoned many people who did nothing wrong at all on January 6, some who never even entered the Capitol, Ray Epps wasn’t prosecuted. In fact, he was a sympathetic witness before the bogus January 6 Committee, and the subject of a glowing portrayal in The New York Times. He actually complained about “conspiracy theorists” harassing him. And unlike perhaps anyone else, there purportedly exists clear video footage documenting his culpability in whatever happened on January 6.
What Tucker Carlson has done is akin to the top rated news talk host airing suppressed footage of 9/11, interviewing all the witnesses who reported explosions, etc. Proving how the buildings couldn’t have collapsed from being struck my airliners. In that case, the response from the political world and the state controlled media would have been identical. January 6 is a huge event, at this point bigger than 9/11, because it’s far more recent, and has resulted in an unknown number of political prisoners, denied all due process, a demonization of all dissent, and the promotion of perhaps the biggest of all their Big Lies.
Merrick Garland, the Attorney General of the United States, again reiterated the monstrous lie that “five police officers died” that day. The footage Tucker showed revealed that Brian Sicknick, who died the day after January 6, wasn’t beaten to death as widely reported. The other four deaths referred to repeatedly were police officers who killed themselves afterwards, some long after January 6. Only by the most twisted logic can their deaths be blamed on the “insurrectionists.” What every real investigative journalist should be asking is; what are the odds of four officers associated with that even committing suicide? But those questions aren’t allowed.
Garland is the top person in the “Justice” department. His one-sided, politicized prosecutions tell you all you need to know about his concept of “justice.” But for him to state such a bald-faced lie, that can be so easily disproved, is indicative of the level of their self-confidence. They feel secure in lying, because no one with any power will call them out on it. And like many sociopaths caught in their deceptions, Chuck Schumer and the others lash out at the “lies” Carlson is telling. They call that projection. Really classic, textbook projection. They’re know they’re lying, and they know you know they’re lying. And they don’t care.
Video of a CNN reporter, back during the initial Gulf “War,” which involved his fake response to a nonexistent SCUD attack, didn’t cause the people to question their media. Katie Couric’s dishonest manipulation of a gun control group didn’t impact her career at all. She’s still probably gritting her teeth somewhere, and earning a lot of money for it. I have said that you could have clear video of the biggest Deep State villains- the Clintons, the Obamas, Bill Gates, etc., committing cold-blooded murder, and it wouldn’t matter to the half of the population that continues to buy lie after lie. Nothing defines their corruption more than their eagerness to deny video evidence.
We saw it in the JFK assassination, with his head being blown backwards with great force, in defiance of the known laws of physics. Oswald, we were told, was behind the president. So Life magazine paid Abraham Zapruder off, and buried the film for thirteen years. But to those betrothed to the lone assassin lie, the video is irrelevant. It was a neurological “jet” response from JFK! We all saw the military tanks crashing into the home (consistently demeaned as a “compound”) of the Branch Davidians at Waco. Doesn’t matter. The evil cultists caused it. Forget about the tanks. They were irrelevant. And most people believed the mouthpieces, and not their own eyes.
Building 7 collapses hours after the planes supposedly hit Buildings 1 and 2 of the World Trade Center. No plane, no debris, ever touched it. Video shows whatever fires existed were nowhere near enough to bring it down. Doesn’t matter. It’s a “conspiracy theory” to even mention Building 7. The laws of physics weren’t working that day, either. Obviously, if Tucker or anyone else talked about this very persuasive evidence to millions of Americans, the effect would be earth-shattering. Look at all the video we saw from the 2020 election. Mysterious boxes appearing under a desk. Poll workers covering the windows so people couldn’t observe the “democratic process.”
Tucker and the rest of the Fox News prime time lineup did a good job of covering the massive fraud in the 2020 election. For a week or so. Obviously, someone talked to them, and the coverage pretty much stopped. Sean Hannity, of all people, did a pretty good investigative piece on the death of Seth Rich some years back. He lost sponsors, and was almost fired. Rich’s family threatened to sue him. Guess they really don’t want to know why their son died. So Tucker must be under enormous pressure right now. He lost most of his sponsorship a few years ago, when he declared on air that there was no such thing as “White Supremacy.” He needs sponsors.
The official story of January 6 is Hall of Fame level disinformation. The police are caught, on film, waving “insurgents” into the building. And when the video is shown, the chief of police reacts with outrage. Not at his officers, who were accomplices to any “insurgency,” but to the exposure of it. The “armed” rioters were not armed. Not a gun in the crowd. The individual most overtly urging violence- Ray Epps- is the one person there that isn’t prosecuted, and the only “insurgent” the media loves. The unconstitutional January 6 committee removes all skeptical members, and allows no other side to be presented. They are a de facto prosecution with laughable “evidence.”
As one of the characters says in the great Frank Capra film Meet John Doe, “This is bigger than whether or not John Doe is a fake.” This is bigger than whether Tucker Carlson, or Alex Jones, or Steve Bannon, or anyone else seemingly reporting the truth on the subject, is fake. The focus should be on what was reported, not who reported it. Or even why they reported it. The truth about January 6 was self-evident to those of us who are awake, even before we saw this new damning footage. But it may have pushed many thousands into our uncrowded corner of the internet. If one picture is worth a thousand words, one video is worth a million or more words.
Anyone who promotes truth, and exposes any of their countless lies, is on our side. They are serving the cause of justice. If they have a vested interest, that would be difficult to prove. If they’re working for the government, again that would be hard to prove. We should all be working for the same goal; to expose just how rotten and corrupt these prominent people are. Maybe we can eventually reach the point where the dumbed down masses finally open their eyes to the undeniable truth. Don’t get distracted by personalities, or disputes within the alternative media. Take the advice of my son John, and accept the win.
Buffalo-horned guy is NOT in prison. They don’t jail agent provocateurs. As he was clearly chosen to play the “crazed” leader of the “insurrection,” thereby enabling the mainstream to paint anyone who questions the validity of the election as equally loony (by association), any “story” about him is a lie. He’s clearly NOT in prison because, to repeat, they don’t jail actors. Otherwise, the actors wouldn’t sign up. The media TELLS you these “insurrectionists” are in jail to scare you and any other potential protestors.
And Sicknick, we know, wasn’t killed during the fake event. But we’re to believe he died the next day? Huh?! Like saying Covid was a psyop (yes, it was), with the draconian responses all designed to get you to take the killer jabs (indeed). But, ya know, the virus is still real. lol
"Tucker Carlson produced the most incredible mainstream journalism I have ever seen" - I totally agree. Also, "What every real investigative journalist should be asking is; what are the odds of four officers associated with that even committing suicide? But those questions aren’t allowed." I can think of only one reason the 4 would commit suicide and that is that THEY DIDN'T; instead they were likely 'suicided' because they wouldn't go along with the hoax. If some FBI thug put a gun to my head and said 'shoot yourself or we'll kill your children - or go along with the hoax", I'd be the 5th guy.