Women of Mass Destruction

Nuclearizing the battle between the sexes

I love women. My head still turns whenever a good looking girl (yeah, I know that’s somehow an offensive term now- add it to my list of Thought Crimes) walks by. That doesn’t happen nearly as much as it used to, given the deteriorating state of so many females in America 2.0. As the probably forbidden old song said- I’m a girl watcher.

So don’t mistake me for a misogynist. I’ve always preferred the company of the fairer sex. They may not generally be as fair as they used to be, but they’re still fairer than us. We can too easily be insensitive, gross, uncouth, unfaithful, and drawn to perversion. Nothing in God’s creation matches the sight of a beautiful female. They are the crown jewel of civilizations. And since I am an unashamedly White man, when I think of this unparalleled beauty, I think primarily of White women. There’s a startling lack of diversity in my mind on this issue. I’m not going to Affirmative Action up my personal tastes, any more than I’d stop liking hamburgers if all the celebrities told me it was racist or transphobic. Huey Long and John F. Kennedy could come back to life and teach a sensitivity course exclusively for me, and I’d still never buy the Michelle Obamas of the world as being beautiful.

Now the odd thing is that those who would least appreciate my affinity for beautiful White women are….beautiful White women. Well, not all of them, but certainly almost all of them with any kind of public platform. Somehow, they would be “offended” at being called beautiful. I have never known of any man, in the history of the world, who was offended at being called handsome. If some clueless guy smiles at a female colleague and says, “nice butt!,” he would be escorted off the premises in short order. But if any male was told “nice butt!” by any female, that would make his day. His month. Maybe his year. And that encapsulates an essential difference between the sexes. Now, I certainly never said that to any female, even back in the glory days of the 1970s. I know it’s an extreme example. But I think the average male would get in trouble these days in most workplaces for simply attempting small talk.

Men and women, boys and girls, are decidedly different creatures. That’s a biological reality, no matter how many deluded authoritative figures join in the transgender madness. This is real “science” you can trust. Now I do suspect that men who “transition” to women, and fool some lonely co-worker into complimenting them on their “nice butt!” would be far less likely to be offended than if the butt in question was attached to a biological female. I don’t think they can “transition” that kind of ego gratification out of the male gender. Very few males, especially when we are young and full of raging hormones, would ever object to being objectified. So that’s always been a source of contention, to some degree. One gender of young people has sex always on their minds, while the other keeps their guard up. Do young men today even think of sex? They’ve been effectively neutered.

The incels- that tragically growing group of involuntarily celibate males- tell us that 80 percent of the females today want the same 20 percent of the males. What they call the Chads. These desirable Chads are evidently having most of the sex for the entire male population. Now, obviously, a situation where the vast majority of young women have no romantic interest in the vast majority of young men is bound to create huge societal problems. It has already created untold numbers of thirty, forty, and fifty year old male virgins. In my generation, this was really unheard of. Young girls now openly boast of their “body counts.” The number of different guys they’ve slept with. Hey, Mom, Jessica’s body count is only twelve! The same way young guys used to brag (and vastly exaggerate) their own number of female conquests.

If 80 percent of the young girls don’t want 80 percent of the young boys, you end up with the situation we have today. Plummeting birth rates. Plummeting marriage rates. More and more lonely people, especially lonely males. I’m speaking primarily about White people here, because the nonstop propaganda that “built” this has been prepared for, and directed at White females. Go for the “bad boy.” The troublemaker your parents hate. That’s cool. Or hot. Snub the nice boy next door, who literally worships you. That’s boring. No drama there. Must have drama all the time. I need to find myself. I need space. Preferably a space where a Chad resides. Babies are expensive. And hard work. It’s irresponsible. More White people is terrible for the planet. Look at all the animals that need rescuing. Give me a few aloof cats instead.

I’ve talked and written about this extensively. Life imitates art. When art was promoting the idea that men had to be “tough” and self-sufficient, they generally were, or tried to be. When art promoted the notion that every girl should be looking for “husband material,” which usually wasn’t a Chad, almost all of them found husbands. When having families was promoted, White women wanted, and gave birth to as many babies as they could. Adult children didn’t disrespect and/or ignore their older parents. But after decades of television shows and films telling them to, we see the reality today. Parental alienation is all too real. And that message was directed at White females like a laser beam. My mother’s too critical! My father won’t let me have the Black boyfriend Hollywood tells me I need! I want more than this!

This attitude goes back to two of the most devastating cultural products, which both came out in the 1950s. The decade when they invented the teenager. First, J.D. Salinger’s overrated book Catcher in the Rye singlehandedly created teenage angst, which had heretofore been an unrecognized term. Teenage angst didn’t exist in frontier days, for example. While Marlon Brando’s The Wild One first established the anti-hero (in other words, someone who wasn’t heroic, but was promoted as such), it was Rebel Without a Cause that really delivered the message the cultural overlords wanted to convey. The teenagers in that film had kind, loving parents. They weren’t being mistreated. They were “rebelling” for no reason. And who were they rebelling against? Certainly not the government. Big business. The Military Industrial Complex. No, they were rebelling against their parents. Why? Just because.

I don’t know when voting patterns between men and women really changed dramatically, but today they tend to vote very differently. It’s been stated that if you took just the male vote alone, every state in the union would be red. This may or may not be literally true, but certainly if you just took the male vote, even with the influx of millions of illegal immigrants, voting almost 100 percent for Democrats, the Republicans would win virtually every election. The entire “Woke” agenda was developed exclusively for White women. Identity Politics, with its emphasis on emotion, and not reason, was geared to traditional feminine traits. Even though many traditional feminine traits have been thoroughly demonized- the desire to be a mother and homemaker, cooking skills, being a supportive wife, etc.- their innate tenderness has been channeled towards pets, transgenders, and nonwhite people.

So White women have been indoctrinated to feel sympathy for “migrants,” and even the most outrageous and aggressive transgenders. And, of course, any and all nonwhites. Remember, a few years ago in Sweden they publicly forgave their migrant rapists. But they have had the empathy drilled out of them when it comes to White males, even close family members. Unless they’re gay. White women treat gay White males with the same love and respect they treat all the nonwhite “marginalized” groups. Shows like Queer Eye for the Straight Guy weren’t written and produced for “queer” audiences. They were designed to attract the attention of White females. Many White women have strangely formed bonds with gay males. Shouldn’t they be looking at them as competition? I guess not, when your expectations are that you “deserve” a Chad, even if you’re tattooed and obese.

There’s an ideological battle going on in most American homes now. Or there was. I think it’s pretty obvious that today’s wives are going to win almost all cultural battles with their continuously slandered, low testosterone mates. And with the advent of the Trumpenstein Project, the battle lines became crystal clear. You were either fer or agin the Giant Orange Man. Period. Since Trumpenstein’s obnoxious personality was scripted to offend today’s easily offended females, they absorbed that message as loudly as they absorbed the one to stop wanting babies. Who knows how many households are split in this way? As the beloved Abraham Lincoln said, a house divided against itself cannot stand. How many American households are not divided against itself? Wives vote Democrat, husbands vote Republican. If you actually believe they’re counting the votes, then you are mindlessly cancelling each other out.

I can’t understand being married to someone who doesn’t share your core values. How can a conservative, small government husband be happy with a pussy hat wearing, “Woke” wife? When she berates “White privilege,” and condemns an entire race- her race, does the submissive husband feel just a little bit hurt? Maybe even offended, the emotional state millions of modern women seem to be perpetually trapped in? After all, he is White. They may have White children. So what does the “Woke” woman want to happen here? To lose her own “privilege?” Will she give up the minivan, the sprawling home in a predominantly White neighborhood? Would she give up her own high paying job, or ask her husband to give up his high paying job, so that some “marginalized” persons of color could have the same opportunity? Would she happily have her White children consigned to lives of menial labor?

The cultural overlords have pushed this theme of husbands and wives disagreeing politically for quite some time. Remember Mary Matalin- the former Bush aide who was married to Nesfaratu-like James Carville, long time apologist for family crime boss Bill Clinton? It was a modern love story. Then there was Republican Governor Schwarzenegger, married to JFK’s niece Maria Shriver. Another charming match between political opposites. I don’t buy it. I think they were promoting just more family discord. No “the family that votes together stays together.” My vote, my choice! And, as always, their programming works swimmingly well. So now there are probably millions of real situations like that. And in the vast majority of cases, the wife is the liberal, and the husband is the conservative.

When the establishment was basically conservative, during the postwar boom so many of us remember fondly, the culture was geared towards men. White men. Television was dominated by westerns and private detective shows. Alpha White males everywhere. You had variety shows directed at men, with dancing girls surrounding the male star. If females like Lucy got out of hand, they got spanked. But by the 1980s at the latest, female characters were totally in charge on all television programs. Kicking White male ass. Showing that they didn’t “need’ a man. Breaking glass ceilings everywhere. If they had any children, it was one or two, and they raised them alone. The Single Mother became a venerated figure, and is still often cited as the epitome of dedication and hard work in the face of difficult struggles. Feature length films pushed the same narratives.

We see just how fractured the relationships are in too many marriages now, by the way the only two scientifically established sexes have responded to the transgender lunacy. Very few fathers have bought the diabolical notion that a small child can be confused about what gender he/she is. Unfortunately, too many unbalanced mothers- and they are overwhelmingly White- have swallowed one of the most ridiculous of all their narratives, hook, line and sinker. White women are the ones breathlessly telling other White women about their child beginning his/her “transition.” They’re the ones bringing their small children to drag queen strip shows. They’re the ones posing with big smiles next to their mutilated daughters, with their Frankenstein chest scars proudly exposed. And they’re the ones winning against outraged fathers in our increasingly TikTokian courtrooms of injustice.

I don’t know what I would do as a young husband today, if my wife showed the slightest inclination that she accepted the transgender agenda. I wouldn’t be able to get over the heartbreak of seeing my young son given hormone blockers and turned into a “girl.” Or my daughter being surgically transformed into a “boy.” How could any marriage survive that? But understand that this is merely falling in line with the voting patterns a majority of White women have displayed now for many years. If they bought the concept of “hate speech,” and “mansplaining,” why wouldn’t they buy into fifty seven genders? Why wouldn’t they accept the idea of announcing your “pronouns?” There is nothing about the insane world of “Woke” politics that they don’t support. If they have doubts, they’ll blame it on their “White privilege.”

I want to make it clear that I am not criticizing all White women here. I have lots of wonderful, loyal female subscribers. My wife is a White woman. So is my daughter. I want my daughter to conquer the world and have everything she wants. And I view my White mother as a kind of saint. Many of those who have spoken out against transgender story hour and critical race theory at school board meetings have been irate White mothers. But the numbers tell us that these kinds of invaluable women are in the minority. They are outnumbered, just as we all are in the public at large. If most families voted as a unit, which they logically should, having the same common interests at stake, then no Democrat could be elected on an insane “Woke” platform.

I’m no chauvinist. I want equal rights for all. Equal pay for equal work. I don’t want women to be forced to live the life my mother did; bound to her hearth and home, living exclusively through her children. I don’t want brides to go back to swearing to “obey” their husbands. But there has to be a happy middle ground. If things continue the way they’re going, the few wedding ceremonies conducted for a biologically male groom and a biologically female bride may include a promise by the husband to “obey” the bride. Women (and society) would probably applaud that. Husbands and wives should love and respect each other. They should be on the same wavelength in terms of raising their children. They have the most important, shared vested interests. They obviously should vote for the same political candidates.

Civilizations are built by strong men. Morally, physically and mentally strong. We don’t have very many strong men in America 2.0. When you can’t stop your wife from mutilating your child, you aren’t in charge of anything. You are at the mercy of the corrupt state, and one of their mouthpieces is sleeping in the same bed with you. One of the primary reasons our criminal leaders remain in their ill begotten positions of power is because of family dysfunction. If so many White women hadn’t lapped up all that devious propaganda for decades, then no “Woke” madness could exist. Even if you control the media, as long as those consuming it don’t robotically obey the messaging, then it doesn’t matter what you’re telling them. Americans should treat their news networks like cartoons, without any entertainment value.

The only reason such demented, and largely incompetent oligarchs can remain in charge is because they have totally divided those they rule. We are divided by race. And religion. By class. And most importantly, by sex. Not the laughable “transgender” debate over nonbinaries, cisgenders, and other Orwellian terms. But between the two kinds of human beings God created; men and women. If we don’t, or can’t get along, then the species can’t continue. The story of civilization ends. We must fight the deadly programming, which is becoming literally satanic in nature. Husbands and wives, parents and children, brothers and sisters, must work together. Stop the petty squabbling that Hollywood tells you is “normal.” We’re all in this together. Love one another. Support each other. To paraphrase an awful expression from the greed fueled 1980s; whoever dies with the most love wins.