Right on, Donald. Unfortunately (or "fortunately," depending on how you look at this), this would also have to include the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There's a fair amount of research out there now exposing the "bomb" as a hoax, where Hiroshima and Nagasaki were instead said to be fire-bombed, given the many still-…
Right on, Donald. Unfortunately (or "fortunately," depending on how you look at this), this would also have to include the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There's a fair amount of research out there now exposing the "bomb" as a hoax, where Hiroshima and Nagasaki were instead said to be fire-bombed, given the many still-standing structures post-bombing (which doesn't mean, of course, that 1000s weren't killed by these "lesser" bombings, just to say that no "atomic bomb" had been, and still hasn't been, developed, unlike what we were told). Besides Miles Mathis (yes, I know, he's an annoying handful at times), there are others who've investigated this apparent "myth" of a nuclear program. Was just looking for some information that I reviewed years ago by another independent researcher on this topic and, of course, now I can't locate it. But there are these:
p.s. Despite the possibility that there's no nuke program, I am in no way defending the US military and its evil acts over the last 100+ years. Quite the contrary. In fact, I was earlier going to write a comment saying how much I have long detested that institution, where nearly all of the genocidal events of the 20th and 21st centuries have prominently featured the US military, including the most recent Convid psyop (i.e., death via vaxx via fake virus), which was clearly run by the DOD in cooperation with global nations -- see, e.g., 2019 Military World Games (which, of all places, was held in Wuhan, China) and their Satanic opening ceremony signaling the diabolical scheme they were about to unleash on the world.
I'm aware that some awake people think nuclear weapons are a hoax, Rob. Who knows? At this point, it's hard to trust the reality of anything they say. Thanks!
Despite the fact that I'm a vet, I also despise the institution and understand why early Americans warned against standing armies.
What most folks do not seem to realize is how horrible the military hierarchy is regarding the troopies and I'm not only referring to the well known Tuskegee experiment, but to the many other examples of complete disregard for the troops and the law such as the anthrax vax mandates (totally immoral and illegal) and the exposure to the various toxic chemicals dumped on the people and land of Vietnam (completely diabolical).
Well said, Rob. When I was in elementary school they showed us films of an alleged atomic blast. You could see a cameraman with his camera on a tripod filming it. If that was a real atomic blast, both the camera and the cameraman, as well as whoever was filming him, would have been disintegrated. Also, most people don't realize that a blast from conventional explosives will create a mushroom cloud.
Exactly right on all scores, there, HD. Mushroom clouds are a regular feature of good 'ol everyday bombs, but we've been made to think they (or at least the supposed "big" ones) are synonymous with atomic/nuclear weapons. (These aren't your grandfather's bombs, I guess.) And, yes, what's up with the filming of the filming? Is it for the making of a "behind the scenes" production, Hollywood style? That alone, imo, makes the whole "event" suspicious.
There's more, Rob. Some months ago I watched a video/podcast where a gentleman was being interviewed on this very subject. This man, who surely is deceased by now, was a top notch researcher and scientist, post World War Two. He was commissioned by the U.S. government to go to the bombed out ruins in Germany and Japan and write detailed reports on the damages for reconstruction evaluation. To his shock, he said the ruins at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, two cities allegedly atomic bombed, were absolutely no different than the ruins of the German cities destroyed by conventional explosives. In particular, the radiation readings from all of the locations were virtually identical. How can this be if atomic weapons were used in Japan? Further, where the atomic bombs allegedly struck the grounds there was no significant hole or crater as there should have been. Almost immediately, post war, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt and in less than 2 years, Japanese people were living there again. We were taught that an area hit by atomic or nuclear weapons would be inhabitable for centuries because of the radiation. So how explain this blatant anomaly? The atom was conceived by ancient Greek philosophers as the smallest particle in all matter, so small it cannot be broken down further, the foundational building block of everything that exists. But quantum physics has proven this theory false as apparently, there is no smallest unit, things go down to infinity. No one has ever seen an atom, not even under the strongest electron microscopes. So how can it be split to create fission and a bomb? Additionally, quantum physics asserts that at that level it is all waves and wave function. How do you split a wave? We are lied to by the System and its sycophants about everything of any significance.
Excellent, Heretic. If you have the name and/or link of the guy who was interviewed, feel free to send along. I'm still trying to locate the research I had on all this that included similar findings as those you mention -- i.e., showing that H and N were fire bombed by conventional weapons. (Have scoured both my old and new pcs for that research and it all seems to have gone "poof," as if hit by an atomic bomb.)
Thank you, Rob. Sorry about the typo, it should be, "uninhabitable". I'll try like Hell to find it, I can kick myself for not saving it. I recall this man said that the burns and lesions on the survivors of Hiroshima & Nagasaki were caused by a napalm like substance that Uncle Saul's valiant, murdering pilots dropped on the cities along with the conventional explosives.
Nuclear weapons are as real as nuclear power plants.
One is a controlled chain-reaction, while the other is
immediate. I'm not sure what people think is going on in a nuclear power plant, whether on land or at sea powering ships. Why mine uranium if it can't be split releasing energy? They wouldn't have depleted uranium rounds if the uranium hadn't gone through a fission process.
You make logical points. However, the testimony of a learned man who examined closely the ruins of Hiroshima & Nagasaki override them. Explain why the radiation readings were minuscule there post bombing, exactly the same as in the rubble of German cities. And, not to be redundant, how Japanese people were able to live there without getting sick so soon after the area was allegedly A-bombed. Again, those films of atomic bomb blasts I watched as a young whelp in elementary school were obviously fake because as aforementioned, both camera men and their cameras would have been blasted to kingdom come. They couldn't have been more than 4 or 5 hundred yards from ground zero. Further, with acquired knowledge over time, it is clear that the constructed ramshackle dwellings that were destroyed in these alleged atomic blasts in the films I saw were demolished by controlled demolition from inside of them, not from an external blast. They imploded, just like the towers on 9/11.
Nuclear power plants exist, operate, and we can thus verify as producers of energy. Nuclear weapons, on the other hand, have been used only twice, so we're told (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945), and it's precisely THIS claim of their use that we're contesting here -- that is, that a-bombs may NOT in fact have been used in the bombing of H and N. So it begs the question: are nuclear weapons in fact "real"? Until the existing claims of their "reality" based on two supposed historical "events" of their use have been either fully verified or fully debunked, we cannot say definitively either way whether nuclear weapons are real or fake.
Just remembered a significant source on a closely related topic to this is Galen Winsor. Very interesting guy who had direct experience with and exposure to everything said to be "radioactive" and otherwise harmful, but which he debunks as nonsense:
I'd be careful here. He (and Mathis) may be whitewashing or downplaying the dangers of ionizing radiation. In like fashion doctors are well known to downplay the dangers of the toxins they mindlessly, recklessly really, advise in spades.
Right on, Donald. Unfortunately (or "fortunately," depending on how you look at this), this would also have to include the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There's a fair amount of research out there now exposing the "bomb" as a hoax, where Hiroshima and Nagasaki were instead said to be fire-bombed, given the many still-standing structures post-bombing (which doesn't mean, of course, that 1000s weren't killed by these "lesser" bombings, just to say that no "atomic bomb" had been, and still hasn't been, developed, unlike what we were told). Besides Miles Mathis (yes, I know, he's an annoying handful at times), there are others who've investigated this apparent "myth" of a nuclear program. Was just looking for some information that I reviewed years ago by another independent researcher on this topic and, of course, now I can't locate it. But there are these:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-tt0C3bZlY
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34994035-death-object
and of course...Miles (one of several that he posted):
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
p.s. Despite the possibility that there's no nuke program, I am in no way defending the US military and its evil acts over the last 100+ years. Quite the contrary. In fact, I was earlier going to write a comment saying how much I have long detested that institution, where nearly all of the genocidal events of the 20th and 21st centuries have prominently featured the US military, including the most recent Convid psyop (i.e., death via vaxx via fake virus), which was clearly run by the DOD in cooperation with global nations -- see, e.g., 2019 Military World Games (which, of all places, was held in Wuhan, China) and their Satanic opening ceremony signaling the diabolical scheme they were about to unleash on the world.
I'm aware that some awake people think nuclear weapons are a hoax, Rob. Who knows? At this point, it's hard to trust the reality of anything they say. Thanks!
Despite the fact that I'm a vet, I also despise the institution and understand why early Americans warned against standing armies.
What most folks do not seem to realize is how horrible the military hierarchy is regarding the troopies and I'm not only referring to the well known Tuskegee experiment, but to the many other examples of complete disregard for the troops and the law such as the anthrax vax mandates (totally immoral and illegal) and the exposure to the various toxic chemicals dumped on the people and land of Vietnam (completely diabolical).
Well said, Rob. When I was in elementary school they showed us films of an alleged atomic blast. You could see a cameraman with his camera on a tripod filming it. If that was a real atomic blast, both the camera and the cameraman, as well as whoever was filming him, would have been disintegrated. Also, most people don't realize that a blast from conventional explosives will create a mushroom cloud.
Exactly right on all scores, there, HD. Mushroom clouds are a regular feature of good 'ol everyday bombs, but we've been made to think they (or at least the supposed "big" ones) are synonymous with atomic/nuclear weapons. (These aren't your grandfather's bombs, I guess.) And, yes, what's up with the filming of the filming? Is it for the making of a "behind the scenes" production, Hollywood style? That alone, imo, makes the whole "event" suspicious.
There's more, Rob. Some months ago I watched a video/podcast where a gentleman was being interviewed on this very subject. This man, who surely is deceased by now, was a top notch researcher and scientist, post World War Two. He was commissioned by the U.S. government to go to the bombed out ruins in Germany and Japan and write detailed reports on the damages for reconstruction evaluation. To his shock, he said the ruins at Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, two cities allegedly atomic bombed, were absolutely no different than the ruins of the German cities destroyed by conventional explosives. In particular, the radiation readings from all of the locations were virtually identical. How can this be if atomic weapons were used in Japan? Further, where the atomic bombs allegedly struck the grounds there was no significant hole or crater as there should have been. Almost immediately, post war, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were rebuilt and in less than 2 years, Japanese people were living there again. We were taught that an area hit by atomic or nuclear weapons would be inhabitable for centuries because of the radiation. So how explain this blatant anomaly? The atom was conceived by ancient Greek philosophers as the smallest particle in all matter, so small it cannot be broken down further, the foundational building block of everything that exists. But quantum physics has proven this theory false as apparently, there is no smallest unit, things go down to infinity. No one has ever seen an atom, not even under the strongest electron microscopes. So how can it be split to create fission and a bomb? Additionally, quantum physics asserts that at that level it is all waves and wave function. How do you split a wave? We are lied to by the System and its sycophants about everything of any significance.
Yes, atomic bombs are fake and ghey. Atoms and molecules are simply constructions of matrix algebra.
Excellent, Heretic. If you have the name and/or link of the guy who was interviewed, feel free to send along. I'm still trying to locate the research I had on all this that included similar findings as those you mention -- i.e., showing that H and N were fire bombed by conventional weapons. (Have scoured both my old and new pcs for that research and it all seems to have gone "poof," as if hit by an atomic bomb.)
Thank you, Rob. Sorry about the typo, it should be, "uninhabitable". I'll try like Hell to find it, I can kick myself for not saving it. I recall this man said that the burns and lesions on the survivors of Hiroshima & Nagasaki were caused by a napalm like substance that Uncle Saul's valiant, murdering pilots dropped on the cities along with the conventional explosives.
Nuclear weapons are as real as nuclear power plants.
One is a controlled chain-reaction, while the other is
immediate. I'm not sure what people think is going on in a nuclear power plant, whether on land or at sea powering ships. Why mine uranium if it can't be split releasing energy? They wouldn't have depleted uranium rounds if the uranium hadn't gone through a fission process.
You make logical points. However, the testimony of a learned man who examined closely the ruins of Hiroshima & Nagasaki override them. Explain why the radiation readings were minuscule there post bombing, exactly the same as in the rubble of German cities. And, not to be redundant, how Japanese people were able to live there without getting sick so soon after the area was allegedly A-bombed. Again, those films of atomic bomb blasts I watched as a young whelp in elementary school were obviously fake because as aforementioned, both camera men and their cameras would have been blasted to kingdom come. They couldn't have been more than 4 or 5 hundred yards from ground zero. Further, with acquired knowledge over time, it is clear that the constructed ramshackle dwellings that were destroyed in these alleged atomic blasts in the films I saw were demolished by controlled demolition from inside of them, not from an external blast. They imploded, just like the towers on 9/11.
Nuclear power plants exist, operate, and we can thus verify as producers of energy. Nuclear weapons, on the other hand, have been used only twice, so we're told (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945), and it's precisely THIS claim of their use that we're contesting here -- that is, that a-bombs may NOT in fact have been used in the bombing of H and N. So it begs the question: are nuclear weapons in fact "real"? Until the existing claims of their "reality" based on two supposed historical "events" of their use have been either fully verified or fully debunked, we cannot say definitively either way whether nuclear weapons are real or fake.
Just remembered a significant source on a closely related topic to this is Galen Winsor. Very interesting guy who had direct experience with and exposure to everything said to be "radioactive" and otherwise harmful, but which he debunks as nonsense:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWhOn5St3uM
I'd be careful here. He (and Mathis) may be whitewashing or downplaying the dangers of ionizing radiation. In like fashion doctors are well known to downplay the dangers of the toxins they mindlessly, recklessly really, advise in spades.